“Then their savage, unscientific attack on Bjorn Lomborg, who was pilloried for suggesting that the IPCC’s data was trustworthy but that the massive funds demanded to ‘correct’ AGW would benefit mankind better by investing them in clean-water supplies in the third world.”

An “unscientific attack” indeed, Insufficiently Sensitive. But it’s what funny about it now is that Lomborg was wrong as well. THe IPCC has been shown to have been not the least bit trustworthy. Lomborg’s tentative criticism was half-baked in comparison to the much darker truth.