174. BC: “It wasn’t her case, so why would a very experienced prosecutor be so adamant that they were guilty if there wasn’t a lot of stuff, apparently much more than was admitted at trial, supporting it?”

Good grief, do you know what you’re talking about? You actually believe a man should be found guilty of a crime with evidence not admissible in the trial.

Why aren’t you found guilty of beating your spouse?
It never happened? Ah, but there was evidence outside the trial saying you did.
Geez!