Catherine:

And Dan expects us to believe that the other ‘evidence’ he has is from someone who knew Killian and what he ‘felt’ about things. Who knew him better than his widow and his son? But I am supposed to completely dismiss them? Maybe Juan Williams can, but it is not that easy for me.

I think Rather thought it was obvious and believable to him, so it would be to the rest of us as well. I also think he overestimated his reputation.

But honestly most people just think this is politics, and fishy politics at that. I know the Dems will come out and demand Bush respond and call him a liar, so what is new? They have never treated him with any respect, why should that change now?

But they might want to back away from this.

These docs came from somewhere and I would l like to know where. The document fairy is not a good enough explanation.