Does knowingly providing a forged document rise to the level of a “third rate burglary”?

If so, someone within CBS needs to consider the fact that the identity of “Deep Throat” is still unknown. There are others within CBS aside from Rather who know the provenance of Rather’s forgeries. If they have any respect for their craft they need to get the information out. If they are concerned about their identity being revealed I would suggest that they retain one of the blogging attorneys from Powerline, or Beldar, or even Glen and make their disclosure through them. Perhaps one of those blogging attorneys could offer an explanation of the inviolability of attorney client communications on their blogs.

If vnjagvet is around perhaps he could comment on the feasibility of what I am suggesting.