Um, flenser, when you’ve established that you consider a belief in individual rights as something not established by a government’s grant as being “socially liberal”, and take a the suggestion that an unsubstantiated rumor about George W having procured an abortion 30 years ago doesn’t mean that we need to have this thread taken over by another pointless argument about the morality of abortion as “socially liberal”, I’ve got to wonder if you don’t have the gain on your “social liberal” sensor turned up a little too high.