Since when does Kitty Kelley have such a sterling reputation for scholarship, anyway? Rightly or wrongly, I’ve always been under the impression she was considered more of high-priced gossip monger, than a serious biographer. Too many sources “who prefer to remain nameless” to be taken all that seriously.

It was quite a few years ago now, but I seem to remember the Kennedys really trashing her over the Jackie O book. And she did a bio on Nancy Reagan that was not at all well-received by conservatives. Rove’s 4 million either won’t read her or won’t believe her.