I have now. I have to say, I’m not terribly impressed. Although I may argue the age a little bit and push it to 30-35, people have paid into the system, refusing to pay out benefits as promised to a system they paid into is tantamount to theft (not that taxes aren’t theft already) Weekly Standard although I read it sometimes is a fairly establishment republican rag, so I’m not suprised at the vitriol directed at Paul, establishment republicans and libertarians don’t get along very well. It something I’ve always found suprising. Personally, if we were going to have a 2 party system, it should be republicans and Libertarians. The democrats need to go. I think we can agree on fiscal policy for the most part, and argue about social issues once the Democrats are ousted from mainstream politics. Anyway, like I said, I’m not a raving Paulian or Paulite or whatever, but honestly fiscal policy should be the focus in 2012 and no one is better at that than Paul. Although I think he lacks ambition. With 1400 federal agencies I’m pretty sure you could get rid of 700 of them and still retain all necessary government services easliy enough.