“It’s John Moore and Knuck who claim that tradition is a sufficient argument — as long as it’s the traditions they like.”

Charlie, what do YOU consider sufficient argument? What is the intellectual undepinning for YOUR position? What religion or school of morals are YOU drawing on, if any? If you reject all of these, what is left but abstract reason?

I have not seen you making arguments from reason either.

Other than saying that those who disagree with you are bigots, do you have an actual argument for your position? And, “It feels right” is not going to cut it.

Perhaps I only deserve a “C” here, but if that is where the standard is being set, you are pulling an “F”.