Get PJ Media on your Apple

Roger L. Simon

Will Putin Destroy Rand Paul?

March 4th, 2014 - 9:12 pm

The problem for Rand Paul is that his father Ron Paul didn’t quite grasp this message, simple as it is. In the World According to Ron Paul all would be well on the foreign front if we here in America would just mend our evil imperialistic ways. It’s as if a perfectly libertarian USA would somehow, magically, render the rest of the vicious thugs referenced above (not to mention all the other thugs we don’t know yet, planning their little adventures in every corner of the globe, including, quite possibly, your neighborhood shopping mall) quiescent.

Put briefly: that’s insane. In fact, it would more than likely be the reverse. A disarmed, or relatively disarmed, America would only encourage these lunatics, as it has with Putin. To al-Qaeda and company it would be an obvious show of weakness. Allahu Akbar and away we go.

Rand Paul is obviously a very bright guy and understands he might have a weakness in this area. He was quick out of the block to publish a statement when the Ukrainian crisis broke.

But unfortunately for him, he will have to do considerably more than that. As the son and heir of Ron Paul, he has more to prove than the rest of us. We live in a tiny world, which is only shrinking by the second. Years ago, Kipling wrote “the wildest dreams of Kew are the facts of Kathmandu.” Now everybody’s dreams and everybody’s facts are all jumbled up. We can’t be isolationists anymore, even if everybody in the country voted that way, closed the international airports and mothballed all the 747s. Isolationism isn’t happening. It’s naive nonsense.

So Rand Paul has a task before him that none of us could envy. We live in a crazy world. Putin is just the start. Anything can happen and probably will, several times over before the election. So Paul has to do what none of us would want to do. He can do it lovingly. He can do it with respect. But — if he wants to be president of the United States — he has to seriously separate himself from his father.

(Artwork created using multiple Shutterstock.com images.)

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
There are two threats to the world at the moment.

Radical jihadists and radical leftism.

Both totalitarian. Both violent, repressive and tyrannical.


Both are "covered" by a mountain of lies and deceit, propaganda and false accusations. Both are advanced by reams of factually vacuous moral relativism.

Jews in general and Israel in particular aren't out marauding around the globe blowing up a disco, a school bus or a van full of nuns. Israel is not invading Jordan's border or building satellite Jewish countries in Venezuela, Cuba or North Korea.

Israel is not claiming the South China Sea or the Red Sea for that matter.

ALL the world's death and destruction...comes at the hands of the totalitarians, the tyrants, and their radical world domination "inspirations".

WE...are the ONE people on earth that can step in front of that. Yes, it gets old. Yes, it is not easy.

But having honor is tested not on the easy, but on the hard. When people sit in silence at atrocity after atrocity undertaken in their name...then they are complicit by passive acquiescence to it.

When those who are charged with stepping in front of a bully, a tyrant, a despot...shirk from that responsibility because it's easier to run and hide, the world suffers.

Allowing people to be bullied because "it's none of our business", disgraces the honor of being the ONE people who can...and should...step in front of tyranny.

Radical Islam and Radical leftism are in bed together. THEY have a common enemy. Freedom. And...us.

There is no moral relativism argument to be made in favor of either of these evils. There certainly is none to be made on behalf of their bedfellowship.

The sooner we come to grips with the choice bestowed upon us by Providence, the sooner we can say out loud which side we are on.

We either have honor or we don't. We either stand against evil or we don't. We either accept the captaincy of rough seas or we jump overboard.

I choose honor.

46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
I know what's in his newsletters and in his speeches.

If he wants to run to me MY President, you damn well can bet your last dollar I am going to put those pieces together, Goebbels.

As I did with Obama as he hid his true intentions and as I will with Rand Paul, who shows all appearances of trying to hide his.

Paulbots can screech their Buchanan-masked arguments all they want. Again, I would join in building the gallows for traitors of every stripe. Nazi, Tokyo Rose or small c communist.

If you are aiding and abetting the enemy, you are the enemy.

And...if you run for an elective office at the highest levels of this nation...I will damn well make it my business to know what is "in your heart". No matter who tries to hide that very thing from the electorate. We have witnessed the totalitarian disaster of NOT seeking those answers hard enough the past five years.

Never again...means never again. Obama called those inquires slander as well. Ron Paul and Obama ...and their followers, have much in common.

Build the gallows.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Paulist/Libertarian foreign policy memes are not new to American history. It is as old as the Republic as the bicentennial of the War of 1812 should remind us. [The war cry was free trade and sailors rights!] You can't have free trade and sailors rights and isolation at the same time. Staying out of foreign conflicts and participation in the world economy are contradictory objectives. If you trade you will fight. The only way to keep out of foreign conflicts is nonintercourse. The hermit Republic can stay out of other people’s business. The "Yankee trader" cannot. So if Libertarians want to end US involvement in foreign conflicts they should step up to the plate and advocate a total ban on economic and political relations with nations outside of North American.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (263)
All Comments   (263)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The basic problem with Senator Rand Paul is that his father is Congressman Ron Paul. Many of Ron Paul's supporters and many of his critics believe Ron Paul is a libertarian, well he isn't and what he actually is, is a social Darwinist. Social Darwinism is a precursor ideology to Nazism and something very nasty in its own right. The idea of supporting Rand Paul for President is utterly mad as he could be a good guy but on the other hand he could be a mini-me of his father and one would only be sure to find out after he was elected president. Supporting Rand Paul for President is like kicking a glass jar to check if it contains nitroglycerin
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
I do not automatically assign Ron Paul's dangerously insane foreign policy ideas to son Rand. Rand seems to have his head screwed on much straighter than his dad, and it's unfair to tar him just because his dad is a screwball. My gosh, that's the same as saying that Hillary is a sexual predator just because her husband is.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
" I do not automatically assign Ron Paul's dangerously insane foreign policy ideas to son Rand. Rand seems to have his head screwed on much straighter than his dad, and it's unfair to tar him just because his dad is a screwball. My gosh, that's the same as saying that Hillary is a sexual predator just because her husband is. ",.
elephant4life

How would you know when Rand Paul makes reasonable comments he has not decided to lie and that once he was elected President he would not be even more extreme in his posituons than his father?
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Thanks Roger for straightening out the idiot libertarians who would believe the obvious lie that war enriches the state like nothing else can, while impoverishing and enslaving its citizens. Lies, myths, superstitions, and propaganda have always been the tools of the warfare state. These tactics are used to keep citizens fired up and threatened, for without them the public would never acquiesce in the never-ending wars of conquest and imperialism that have long characterized the American state.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
"Rand Paul has a task before him that none of us could envy"

But if you have his aspirations, isn't this is a wonderful opportunity to accomplish the task?
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Like Eisenhower, I want the U.S. to be strong enough to defend its national interests, but very selective about what those interests actually are.

The problem is that we've been doing just the opposite.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Awful!
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Straw man arguments? How about, "we're not isolationists, we're non-interventionists"? The latter may be a better definition, but the former is the traditional term, and a dead rose by any other name smells just as bad. Or how about "guilt by association" for a newsletter published for years with Ron Paul's name on it, which he stood behind?

Of all of the cheap, deceitful, lying politicians, Ron Paul is the overwhelming champion. He could give lessons to Obama. Anybody who listened to the second debate carefully could see that.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
Thank you, Roger, for a voice crying in the wilderness. America is once again entering a period of Isolation, and the voices pushing for it are coming as much from the Right as from the Left. It will end as it always does, with countless dead American boys (and maybe girls, this time). Or maybe it won't and the US will be a tribute-paying colony of some alliance of dictators.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
I can no longer say that a Rand Paul Presidency is more frightening than a Barry Soetoro Presidency, although it, and that, may yet come to pass. The problem with the Orthodox Isolationists is that they truly believe that an America minding its business, tucked between the oceans like an island with a pituitary condition, will indeed cause harmony to burst out in Ho Chi Minh City, and angels to rise above the Balkans. Bless their hearts, sort of. And there is an element of self-hatred in their logic, combined as ever with the necessary enterprise of finding the ones who 'force' America into intervention, the ones without whom sanity would prevail, and Putin go back to growing cabbage and piping Shostakovich into his KGB brain while he works out with a team of brown bears.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
(It's the Joos), saith Ron of Paul. Cue Charles Lindbergh and the rest.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
If our military were twice its current size it would be foolish to get in the middle of Russia and Ukraine. Imagine the long supply lines. Not to mention the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons. Now if Russia decides to intervene in Canada we would have a legitimate interest. The world is full of bad guys. We can't fight them all.
46 weeks ago
46 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 4 5 Next View All