<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2010/01/16/copenhagen-revisited-nancys-climate-bacchanal/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:21:15 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Copenhagen Revisited: Nancy's Climate Bacchanal</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I thought I was done writing about my trip to the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen last December, but just when you think you&amp;#8217;re out, as Mario Puzo once put it, they pull you back in.  And what did my pulling in in this instance was the CBS report on the amazingly lavish junket (well, not so amazingly really) of Nancy Pelosi &amp;#038; Co. to the Scandinavian capital.  I learned therein that seventeen, count &amp;#8217;em seventeen, Members (many with spouses and even children) went to the conference with their staffs, utilizing three military jets and booking 321 hotel nights at the posh Copenhagen Marriott.  The carbon footprint of all that &amp;#8211; assuming you believe in AGW, and most of them claim to &amp;#8211; was immense. The amount of serious discussion that went on was practically nil.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:19:02 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2010/01/16/copenhagen-revisited-nancys-climate-bacchanal-n217663</link></item></channel></rss>