<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2009/10/29/should-i-read-the-new-healthcare-bill-or-finish-remembrance-of-things-past/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:08:54 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Should I read the new healthcare bill or finish Remembrance of Things Past?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I understand the healthcare bill, in its current iteration, runs 1990 pp.  That&amp;#8217;s a lot of pp., even for an Evelyn Woods graduate, which I&amp;#8217;m not, and, to be honest, I never did finish  Remembrance of Things Past.  I want to be a good citizen, but  if I ever get the extra time, I suspects I&amp;#8217;ll choose Proust&amp;#8217;s epic, which probably contains more information about health (among many other things), over Pelosi&amp;#8217;s.  Somehow the French masterpiece seems &amp;#8220;more considered&amp;#8221; and the first volumes, which were assigned in my college comp lit class, were pretty damn good.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:37:19 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2009/10/29/should-i-read-the-new-healthcare-bill-or-finish-remembrance-of-things-past-n217592</link></item></channel></rss>