<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon &#8211; Franklin Delano Obama?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102608</link>
		<dc:creator>hermie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102608</guid>
		<description>Obama is simply following the pattern he learned while in the Illinois Senate.

Governor Ryan came up with his &#039;Built Illinois&#039; program that dictated infrastructure improvements, which coincidentally were performed by politically connected contractors in politically-connected districts. (Which is why many call it the &#039;Bilk Illinois&#039; program.)

The problem was that the taxpayer was forced to pay for this by raising &#039;fees&#039;, &#039;licenses&#039; and other &#039;revenue-enhancements&#039;. Obama went along with this, even though he knew that the rest of the Illinois obligations towards the pension system, the Medicare system, and school system were about to bring a financial disaster to the state. 

Of course, he was able to get himself another job which he grew too weary of doing, so he started running for the Presidency, where he could always blame Congress, his advisors, and of course, George Bush for any problems which might make him look bad for lack of leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is simply following the pattern he learned while in the Illinois Senate.</p>
<p>Governor Ryan came up with his &#8216;Built Illinois&#8217; program that dictated infrastructure improvements, which coincidentally were performed by politically connected contractors in politically-connected districts. (Which is why many call it the &#8216;Bilk Illinois&#8217; program.)</p>
<p>The problem was that the taxpayer was forced to pay for this by raising &#8216;fees&#8217;, &#8216;licenses&#8217; and other &#8216;revenue-enhancements&#8217;. Obama went along with this, even though he knew that the rest of the Illinois obligations towards the pension system, the Medicare system, and school system were about to bring a financial disaster to the state. </p>
<p>Of course, he was able to get himself another job which he grew too weary of doing, so he started running for the Presidency, where he could always blame Congress, his advisors, and of course, George Bush for any problems which might make him look bad for lack of leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102577</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102577</guid>
		<description>I think we can debate the merits of improving infrastructure and its effects on the economy. However, I hope we can all agree that this doing it &quot;to create jobs&quot; as in the construction jobs of the infrastructure is a terrible thing. I grew up in Canada. That is how Government created jobs, by making more government projects. It is not pretty, and does not create jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can debate the merits of improving infrastructure and its effects on the economy. However, I hope we can all agree that this doing it &#8220;to create jobs&#8221; as in the construction jobs of the infrastructure is a terrible thing. I grew up in Canada. That is how Government created jobs, by making more government projects. It is not pretty, and does not create jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insufficiently Sensitive</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102575</link>
		<dc:creator>Insufficiently Sensitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102575</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s hard not to be sympathetic to the goals. (Our highway system appears to have gone backwards in recent decades.) &lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s hard not to think that the urban &#039;enlightened&#039; who dominate the political class have much to do with that highway decay.  Much of their thinking is anti-individual and collectivist, and tends to light on massive &#039;solutions&#039; to congestion such as light rail schemes.  Those not only get lots of publicity, but soak up a lot of tax dollars which can be then spread through their hierarchies to benefit consultant groups and unions, from which many votes can later be harvested.

Tax dollars going to support road networks would also support freedom of choice of individual travellers, to determine their own routing and scheduling. But those wise urban elites also largely combine to punish people who use and depend on cars, saying loudly that their mass-transportation schemes are far superior than any one driver&#039;s misinformed choice of where and when to go.  It&#039;s no wonder that the highway systems are in decay, since the tax dollars which might have maintained them are siphoned off for mega-transportation schemes no matter how financially unproductive.

We may expect the collectivist Obama administration to accelerate and exaggerate this sort of thinking - all those millions of &#039;new jobs&#039; are unlikely to go into highway maintenance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s hard not to be sympathetic to the goals. (Our highway system appears to have gone backwards in recent decades.) </i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard not to think that the urban &#8216;enlightened&#8217; who dominate the political class have much to do with that highway decay.  Much of their thinking is anti-individual and collectivist, and tends to light on massive &#8216;solutions&#8217; to congestion such as light rail schemes.  Those not only get lots of publicity, but soak up a lot of tax dollars which can be then spread through their hierarchies to benefit consultant groups and unions, from which many votes can later be harvested.</p>
<p>Tax dollars going to support road networks would also support freedom of choice of individual travellers, to determine their own routing and scheduling. But those wise urban elites also largely combine to punish people who use and depend on cars, saying loudly that their mass-transportation schemes are far superior than any one driver&#8217;s misinformed choice of where and when to go.  It&#8217;s no wonder that the highway systems are in decay, since the tax dollars which might have maintained them are siphoned off for mega-transportation schemes no matter how financially unproductive.</p>
<p>We may expect the collectivist Obama administration to accelerate and exaggerate this sort of thinking &#8211; all those millions of &#8216;new jobs&#8217; are unlikely to go into highway maintenance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boojum</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102571</link>
		<dc:creator>Boojum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102571</guid>
		<description>Lower or remove the capital gains tax.  That should get investment going again.

Stop all foreign aid and spend the money on Americans. It&#039;s their cash after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lower or remove the capital gains tax.  That should get investment going again.</p>
<p>Stop all foreign aid and spend the money on Americans. It&#8217;s their cash after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102565</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102565</guid>
		<description>The best long term policy would be a dramatic reduction in corporate tax rates. Lowering the marginal rates for individuals would be an instant boost to the economy, but probably not politically feasible given our lurch to the left with the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best long term policy would be a dramatic reduction in corporate tax rates. Lowering the marginal rates for individuals would be an instant boost to the economy, but probably not politically feasible given our lurch to the left with the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102564</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102564</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the comments with the exception of the fact that federal spending will crowd out private investment.  The difference between now and the 30&#039;s is the integrated world economy.  Our new public debt will be purchased by the Chinese and the oil exporters and thus should not as greatly effect the potential private capital investment.The greatest fear I have is that there would be an attempt to monetize the debt, producing significant inflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the comments with the exception of the fact that federal spending will crowd out private investment.  The difference between now and the 30&#8242;s is the integrated world economy.  Our new public debt will be purchased by the Chinese and the oil exporters and thus should not as greatly effect the potential private capital investment.The greatest fear I have is that there would be an attempt to monetize the debt, producing significant inflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102558</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102558</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It seems to me that it is quite rediculous to ignore the fact that releasing the oil companies to do what they want to do, what we need them to do, would go a long way toward solving two of our biggest economic problems, on their dime, and nobody is talking about it anymore.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, it&#039;s ridiculous, but bear in mind that not only is Obama NOT going to do anything to unleash the oil companies, he has promised to punish them -- punish them by seizing a portion of their profits to provde &quot;energy rebates&quot; to &quot;middle class Americans&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It seems to me that it is quite rediculous to ignore the fact that releasing the oil companies to do what they want to do, what we need them to do, would go a long way toward solving two of our biggest economic problems, on their dime, and nobody is talking about it anymore.</i></p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s ridiculous, but bear in mind that not only is Obama NOT going to do anything to unleash the oil companies, he has promised to punish them &#8212; punish them by seizing a portion of their profits to provde &#8220;energy rebates&#8221; to &#8220;middle class Americans&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishlad317</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102557</link>
		<dc:creator>irishlad317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102557</guid>
		<description>We have two problems: lack of jobs, and a need for domestic energy (even as gas slips back down to $2 per gallon, the lion&#039;s share of that $2 still goes out of the country and we have little control over a rise in prices).  Doesn&#039;t it make sense for Pres. Elect Obama to unleash the oil companies and their billions to explore for and drill for oil?  Thousands of jobs would be created and the government wouldn&#039;t pay a dime.  Yes, also invest in green technologies.  It seems to me that it is quite rediculous to ignore the fact that releasing the oil companies to do what they want to do, what we need them to do, would go a long way toward solving two of our biggest economic problems, on their dime, and nobody is talking about it anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have two problems: lack of jobs, and a need for domestic energy (even as gas slips back down to $2 per gallon, the lion&#8217;s share of that $2 still goes out of the country and we have little control over a rise in prices).  Doesn&#8217;t it make sense for Pres. Elect Obama to unleash the oil companies and their billions to explore for and drill for oil?  Thousands of jobs would be created and the government wouldn&#8217;t pay a dime.  Yes, also invest in green technologies.  It seems to me that it is quite rediculous to ignore the fact that releasing the oil companies to do what they want to do, what we need them to do, would go a long way toward solving two of our biggest economic problems, on their dime, and nobody is talking about it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gippergal</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102556</link>
		<dc:creator>gippergal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102556</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s going to have to create some new jobs, in order to generate enough income tax to cover all these projects!

The new president also can&#039;t afford not to intervene in the economic crisis: both sides of the aisle will be at his throat in 2012 if it appears he didn&#039;t act when he needed to in order to help stem the crisis. I&#039;m betting the leftist illuminati don&#039;t want the possibility of a Hillary challenge in four years, not because they&#039;re against her, but because it would be so divisive to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s going to have to create some new jobs, in order to generate enough income tax to cover all these projects!</p>
<p>The new president also can&#8217;t afford not to intervene in the economic crisis: both sides of the aisle will be at his throat in 2012 if it appears he didn&#8217;t act when he needed to in order to help stem the crisis. I&#8217;m betting the leftist illuminati don&#8217;t want the possibility of a Hillary challenge in four years, not because they&#8217;re against her, but because it would be so divisive to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/11/22/coming-soon-franklin-delano-obama/#comment-102553</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/?p=4566#comment-102553</guid>
		<description>Well, I woke up in a 1930&#039;s America after all! Having been born in 1939, my family and I (as other Americans) lived through the New Deal and more.  I prefer JFK&#039;s motto, &quot;Ask not what your country can do for you; but what you can do for your country.&quot; While campaigning, Obama said he would fix it (the problems facing us), but he never said &quot;how.&quot;  Anyone want to buy a pig in a poke? I&#039;ve got one!  Differences? 21st Century New Dealers use the Internet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I woke up in a 1930&#8242;s America after all! Having been born in 1939, my family and I (as other Americans) lived through the New Deal and more.  I prefer JFK&#8217;s motto, &#8220;Ask not what your country can do for you; but what you can do for your country.&#8221; While campaigning, Obama said he would fix it (the problems facing us), but he never said &#8220;how.&#8221;  Anyone want to buy a pig in a poke? I&#8217;ve got one!  Differences? 21st Century New Dealers use the Internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

