Comments on: The Suha Kiss: Hillary gets Palin Derangement Syndrome over Ahmadinejad Demonstration

By: dripable

dripable — Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:22:37 +0000

I couldnt think you are more right…

By: GayPatriot » In Obama-speak, Post-partisan means purely partisan

GayPatriot » In Obama-speak, Post-partisan means purely partisan — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:18:35 +0000

[...] The GOP had tapped vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin to speak for our party. Hillary Clinton would speak for the Democrats. That latter backed out, claiming via a spokesman that Palin’s presence was news to them: “Clearly there was some miscommunication because this was never billed to us as a partisan political event. Sen. Clinton will therefore not be attending this event” (Via Roger L. Simon). [...]

By: yochanan

yochanan — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:45:20 +0000

hillary proved it was never about supporting israel but it WAS ALL ABOUT HILLARY.

J-STREET AND DEMOCRAT UNCLE JAKES proved it was not about what was good for Israel but instead what was good for obama and the democrat party.

hopefully some of the thinking jews will get it ONLY JOHN MCCAIN IS QUALIFIED TO BE COMMANDER IN CHIEF.

Gov’r Palin was known to have a Israel flag in her office even before she was chosen to be VPOTUS and even though there are very few jews in Alaska. Sarah clearly stated she wasn’t going to second guess an allie (Israel) on how they would defend themseleves.

John McCain saw evil when he was a POW. he clearly knows the iranians are evil Obama says he can talk to them like that is going to work.

By: Lem

Lem — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:52:16 +0000

What is the French word for this?

Let’s have Bradley balance Pajama TV… maybe?

By: Bill Bradley

Bill Bradley — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:17:25 +0000

Does the “thugocracy” include Howard Berman, Henry Waxman, and Mel Levine?

The best friends of Israel ever in the United State Congress?

>Jonathan Burack:

Hillary backs out to give Palin the stage and thereby embarrass Obama. Obama’s thugocracy in the making then pressures the Jewish organizations to push Palin off the stage. The Jewish organizations, ready to ask us all to stand firm against Iran, crumble before the liberal Democratic juggernaut. A plausible scenario? After what the Obama team did the Stanley Kurtz, I do not think it takes an Olver Stone to see it this way.
Sep 18, 2008 – 5:46 pm

By: Bill Bradley

Bill Bradley — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:15:34 +0000

What is the French word for this?

>UPDATE: As is pretty well known by now, the Jewish organizations protesting Ahmadinejad have rescinded their invitation to Palin. There is a Yiddish word for this – schande.

By: Cynic

Cynic — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:57:38 +0000

“This is a slap in the face by Jews to their natural allies on the right.”

What, all Jews get slapped with the actions of some worried about what their “Left of Progressive Left Fascist” neighbours think?

If Hilary was truly sincere about smashing the glass ceiling she would be there anyway in the interests of Iranian woman and the treatment meted out to them by a_mad_jihadi and co., and not conform to Donkey politics.

By: tanarg

tanarg — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:57:45 +0000

Let the focus be opposition to everything that nutcase Ahmalatefordinnah stands for and ditch the prez-related stuff, okay?

By: cubanbob

cubanbob — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 07:14:00 +0000

Must have been the Hollywood crowd that muscled the groups in to backing down. I would not be surprised if a few very wealthy progressive types (urged on by the Obama people)threaten to withhold their donations. It is a shame the organizers did not tell the to go eff themselves and keep their money and then publicly call them out. On balance, they will probably lose more of their supporters and donors than whatever gain they sought to achieve by placating those leftist self hating Jews.

By: Mister Snitch!

Mister Snitch! — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:33:25 +0000

“Prunes don’t look good next to plums.”

DING DING DING!