<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/07/12/following-the-money-rangels-no-nader/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:57:54 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Following the money: Rangel's no Nader</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Amidst the current brouhaha surrounding Charlie Rangel&amp;#8217;s cheap rent, it&amp;#8217;s worth noting that the  veteran congressman (since 1971) has a relatively piddling net worth of &amp;#8220;$566,000 to $1.2 million, according to Congressional disclosure records.&amp;#8221; That&amp;#8217;s not much on Capitol Hill where Speaker of the House Pelosi is worth well in excess of 25 mill and a whole passel of senators (Kerry, Kohl, Kennedy, Clinton, etc.) are even richer.  Hell, Rangel&amp;#8217;s not even worth half of Ralph Nader. Now I don&amp;#8217;t mean to justify rent cheating, if that&amp;#8217;s what he&amp;#8217;s doing, but the guy&amp;#8217;s 78-years old with 37 years in Congress and if all he&amp;#8217;s got to show for it is a million bucks, there&amp;#8217;s reason to think that, compared to his colleagues, he&amp;#8217;s a saint.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:47:50 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2008/07/12/following-the-money-rangels-no-nader-n215976</link></item></channel></rss>