<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/06/27/ranking-the-ads-larry-rohter-vs-frank-luntz/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:44:27 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Ranking the Ads: Larry Rohter vs. Frank Luntz</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Another indication that the New York Times is more biased (yikes!) than Fox News [&amp;#8230;but that&amp;#8217;s impossible.-ed.  Anything is possible, my son.] is how the two outlets evaluate the political ads assaulting the airwaves these days.  The Times assigns Larry Rohter essentially to review them.  So what we are given is simply one man&amp;#8217;s opinion. Today, good Timesman that he is, he doesn&amp;#8217;t much like McCain&amp;#8217;s new energy ad.  Rohter concludes: But voters under 50 may not recall John F. Kennedy’s promise to put a man on the moon in less than a decade, and the musical accompaniment, a mix of electronica, percussion and swelling strings, seems more somber than uplifting.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:20:44 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2008/06/27/ranking-the-ads-larry-rohter-vs-frank-luntz-n215887</link></item></channel></rss>