<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/06/25/polling-the-polls-are-they-gibberish/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:23:44 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Polling the polls: are they gibberish?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Since I&amp;#8217;m for McCain, I was pleased to read the Arizona Senator has evened things up with Obama in the new Gallup Poll. But is this real?  Only a few days ago, the LATimes was showing an Obama slaughter.  What changed?  Is it the pump prices and Obama&amp;#8217;s non-response to drilling?  McCain seems to have a more coherent and multi-faceted energy plan while Obama seems mired in very old-fashioned anti-nuke liberalism, but still&amp;#8230; The question is the polls.  How do we know if and when to believe them?  We are looking for someone to write dispassionately about this on Pajamas Media.  Feel free to leave suggestions here.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:24:24 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2008/06/25/polling-the-polls-are-they-gibberish-n215874</link></item></channel></rss>