<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2008/03/23/how-to-read-the-propagandistic-drivel-at-the-new-york-times/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:13:03 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>How to read the propagandistic drivel at the New York Times</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Long ago in a universe far away, the New York Times published the news.  Now they publish &amp;#8220;think pieces&amp;#8221;, which are basically filler with an ideological tinge or should I call it frisson? You can usually recognize this pabulum from a pretty far distance&amp;#8211;it almost always prominently placed on the front page&amp;#8211;and has a title like today&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Obama&amp;#8217;s promise of a new majority, and the question it prompts&amp;#8220;.  These articles are almost always several hundred or more words long with many &amp;#8220;experts&amp;#8221; marshaled for their opinions. Reading them can be  time-consuming. What to do?]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:05:13 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2008/03/23/how-to-read-the-propagandistic-drivel-at-the-new-york-times-n215434</link></item></channel></rss>