Comments on: Huckabee Not Going for the Latino Vote

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:07:38 +0000

“if raising the minimum wage and making it easier for low-wage workers to organize is damaging to the economy, wouldn’t removing millions of low-wage workers from the economy through strict immigration enforcement be similarly damaging?”

The rule of law of course means nothing to markus in this spurious comparison, made after exactly zero references in the thread to unions or minimum-wage law. You were right about him the first time, MikeD.

“I don’t think anyone is talking about pointing guns and pushing people into boxcars in the middle of the night.”

Actually markus has quite an obsession with boxcars.

By: Boojum

Boojum — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:50:54 +0000

Too much discourse is focused on blaming the Mexicans. They wouldn’t be coming if we weren’t hiring. The problem is 90% our fault.

By: MikeD

MikeD — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:01:52 +0000

Fair enough Markus. My response then, “is not necessarily”. Your argument implies that raising the minimum wage and making it easier for low-wage workers to organize, and removing illegal immigrants are: 1) linked, and 2) invariably injurious and that only damage can result from either action. I would argue that a “sensible” approach to immigration might very well provide labor where truly needed, might ultimately induce undereducated teenagers and our indigent to flip hamburgers and mow lawns, and would cause the “economy” to adjust in a variety of unanticipated ways without causing undue havoc to the cost structure. And when the social costs of servicing a majority of the unskilled and uneducated 12 million illegals is considered there may be a net offset. I worry anytime someone simply assumes doing nothing is unavoidable. Which then begins to address David’s additional point. Yes, some illegals have American born children and employment. So what? And assuming only 1 million can be induced to leave seems naive. I could posit 8 million leaving to support my own argument but there is no basis for either figure. David wants to do nothing so assumes a low number. That is not an argument, that is simply an excuse.

And with that, gentlemen, I must go to work.

By: markus

markus — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:00:12 +0000

I didn’t raise any points, spurious or otherwise, Mike. I noted an apparent inconsistency and asked for a rational answer, which AS ALWAYS I am very open to. If you lack the ability to provide one, you can just be quiet, rather than insult me. Once more: if raising the minimum wage and making it easier for low-wage workers to organize is damaging to the economy, wouldn’t removing millions of low-wage workers from the economy through strict immigration enforcement be similarly damaging?

By: David Thomson

David Thomson — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:14:06 +0000

I believe that only about one million of the country’s twelve million illegals will ever return home. Many have American born children and solid employment. No, let’s primarily focus our efforts on preventing more from entering the country. Assisting employers with identifying those eligible to work in the country is very important.

Race and ethnicity should have nothing to do with our immigration laws. We should merely pick the best candidates to reside in our country.

By: TomTom

TomTom — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:05:52 +0000

MikeD: I’m with you. But what do we do if Mexico refuses to let the illegals back in because they are “undocumented”? The Mexicans running the place are pricks, and by no means above such a stunt. “They might be Guatamalans or Nicaraguans!” Can’t you just hear it? We have got to come to grips with that.

It will prove difficult, but probably best, to encourage their piecemeal return by denying them jobs, healthcare, housing, education. But the Dems will roadblock any and all such legislation in DC.

I’ve posted this before somewhere, but please consider we would have 40 million more native US citizens without Roe v. Wade.

By: MikeD

MikeD — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:43:18 +0000

I at first thought I might address the points raised by Markus above. Then I realized I would simply be wasting my time since reason in response to his weak and spurious points would have no impact regardless of the validity of anything I might say. He wants a pissing contest. I have made my point, he adds nothing to the discussion, and I have better things to do.

By: markus

markus — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:23:34 +0000

Let’s assume we have a viable employee verification system with huge penalties for hiring an illegal immigrant. And so they do go home. And we give Tancredo a blank check and put him in charge of building a wall. Wouldn’t such an outcome be just as hard or harder on small businesses and consumers as, oh, for instance, raising the minimum wage supposedly is, or making it easier for workers to join a union? If you think those are bad ideas, why do you also support forcing employers to find Americans willing to dig ditches, clean toilets, and pick lettice for a living?

By: MikeD

MikeD — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:21:04 +0000

I don’t think anyone is talking about pointing guns and pushing people into boxcars in the middle of the night. That is a typically liberal false analogy and logical misdirection. Self-removal caused by a lack of incentive to stay (i.e. no job) has hardly been tried extensively but where it has recently been pursued it has been effective (fledgling Oklahoma and Arizona efforts come to mind). So I sense, David, that you are simply wrong, uninformed of events, or in denial. The train you say left the station long ago is really just the enforcement of existing law. And, while enforcement of existing law may not spur all 12 million to leave, it could have a significant impact on the number of prior illegal arrivals. Certainly it is preferable to your apparent willingness to surrender.

By: jrdroll

jrdroll — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:03:58 +0000

“I have no interest in pointing guns at people and pushing them onto boxcars in the middle of the night.”

I haven’t heard of anyone suggesting this solution excerpt for the pro illegal immigration partisans.
Make life difficult for illegals to work in the US and they will go home how they came here: one at a time.