<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/22/the-redford-reduction/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 07:14:25 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Redford Reduction</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I haven&amp;#8217;t seen Robert Redford&amp;#8217;s Lions for Lambs yet, few have evidently, but that hasn&amp;#8217;t stopped Roger Friedman, who hasn&amp;#8217;t seen it either, from writing in its behalf as a brilliant and subtle anti-war film of sorts.  Apparently the Republican owner of the Washington Redksins saw it and liked it and sent word to Friedman. One graph of Friedman&amp;#8217;s article caught my eye:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:55:40 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2007/10/22/the-redford-reduction-n214623</link></item></channel></rss>