<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alan Fram &#8211; &#8220;poll analyst&#8221; for the AP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbb</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90142</link>
		<dc:creator>jbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90142</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger,

Gasoline is at $3.00/gallon and the value of real estate is falling pretty fast.

I don&#039;t think George Bush or Congress has much to do with either, but either way, approval numbers are bound to reflect the situation.

The high cost of gas and oil, and the falling real estate market are not necessisarily bad things, but people don&#039;t like them.

James
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger,</p>
<p>Gasoline is at $3.00/gallon and the value of real estate is falling pretty fast.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think George Bush or Congress has much to do with either, but either way, approval numbers are bound to reflect the situation.</p>
<p>The high cost of gas and oil, and the falling real estate market are not necessisarily bad things, but people don&#8217;t like them.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always right</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90141</link>
		<dc:creator>Always right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90141</guid>
		<description>Early on, I tried to participate in the &#039;so-called&quot; polls over the phone exactly one time.  The questions as they were phrased were so lopsided, I just terminated the &quot;polling&quot; after about 2, 3 min.

After that I refused to answer any more polls.  I wonder &quot;Is that why there is consistently less conservative representation in most polls?&quot;  Because you just know the result would be?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early on, I tried to participate in the &#8216;so-called&#8221; polls over the phone exactly one time.  The questions as they were phrased were so lopsided, I just terminated the &#8220;polling&#8221; after about 2, 3 min.</p>
<p>After that I refused to answer any more polls.  I wonder &#8220;Is that why there is consistently less conservative representation in most polls?&#8221;  Because you just know the result would be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insufficiently Sensitive</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90140</link>
		<dc:creator>Insufficiently Sensitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 03:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90140</guid>
		<description>Well, the guys in my local bar (including myself, of course) are every bit as good at analyzing polls as this Alan Fram fellow, whoever he is.

We shall begin our analysis with the source of our information: the big newspapers, or the network TV stations (herein abbreviated MSM).  It may be observed that they are the source of the phrase &#039;poll analyst&#039; - as if all this guy does is sit with a 6&quot; magnifying glass peering at poll results, and phoning in his opinions to Headquarters where they&#039;re run up on a Scientific Meter.  Well, horsebeans.  He&#039;s in the bar down the street from us, and their BS is no more perceptive nor sensitive than ours is.

We continue by focusing OUR 6&quot; magnifying glass (hell, let&#039;s use the 12&quot; one, that proves we&#039;re smarter) on said MSM, and applying our formidable memory meanwhile.  What do we learn?  That for a period of time unprecedented in US history (almost TWO FULL TERMS), said MSM has relentlessly devoted most of its communications talents and more than half its page space and broadcast time into pouring scorn, spite, disdain, outrage, hate, opposition and treachery over all actions, hopes and policies of the Bush Administration.

I defy anyone to demonstrate that any other Administration (including Nixon&#039;s) has faced such prolonged and concerted opprobrium from the folks who &#039;inform&#039; us of current events.

Our conclusion is clear: public opinion being  heavily influenced by said MSM, by which  the population receives most of its daily information about world events, the MSM may take a bow and claim the credit for those largely manufactured low ratings.

The MSM must also bear some responsibility for undermining the whole concept of democracy through its ultra-cynical manipulation of public opinion, and the resulting lack of esteem that all of our elected representatives now bear.

This is not a good thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the guys in my local bar (including myself, of course) are every bit as good at analyzing polls as this Alan Fram fellow, whoever he is.</p>
<p>We shall begin our analysis with the source of our information: the big newspapers, or the network TV stations (herein abbreviated MSM).  It may be observed that they are the source of the phrase &#8216;poll analyst&#8217; &#8211; as if all this guy does is sit with a 6&#8243; magnifying glass peering at poll results, and phoning in his opinions to Headquarters where they&#8217;re run up on a Scientific Meter.  Well, horsebeans.  He&#8217;s in the bar down the street from us, and their BS is no more perceptive nor sensitive than ours is.</p>
<p>We continue by focusing OUR 6&#8243; magnifying glass (hell, let&#8217;s use the 12&#8243; one, that proves we&#8217;re smarter) on said MSM, and applying our formidable memory meanwhile.  What do we learn?  That for a period of time unprecedented in US history (almost TWO FULL TERMS), said MSM has relentlessly devoted most of its communications talents and more than half its page space and broadcast time into pouring scorn, spite, disdain, outrage, hate, opposition and treachery over all actions, hopes and policies of the Bush Administration.</p>
<p>I defy anyone to demonstrate that any other Administration (including Nixon&#8217;s) has faced such prolonged and concerted opprobrium from the folks who &#8216;inform&#8217; us of current events.</p>
<p>Our conclusion is clear: public opinion being  heavily influenced by said MSM, by which  the population receives most of its daily information about world events, the MSM may take a bow and claim the credit for those largely manufactured low ratings.</p>
<p>The MSM must also bear some responsibility for undermining the whole concept of democracy through its ultra-cynical manipulation of public opinion, and the resulting lack of esteem that all of our elected representatives now bear.</p>
<p>This is not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ic</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90139</link>
		<dc:creator>ic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90139</guid>
		<description>Worst ever? I thought a couple of months ago Bush&#039;s was 29%, Congress&#039;s was 14%. Bush&#039;s approval actually improves because he refuses to cave in to the defeatists. Congress rating improves an astounding 57% (i.e. (22-14)/14 %) for not forcing a retreat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worst ever? I thought a couple of months ago Bush&#8217;s was 29%, Congress&#8217;s was 14%. Bush&#8217;s approval actually improves because he refuses to cave in to the defeatists. Congress rating improves an astounding 57% (i.e. (22-14)/14 %) for not forcing a retreat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Okie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Okie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90138</guid>
		<description>Not being one for conspiracy theories, I have been somewhat skeptical about the idea that George Soros is attempting to discredit our institutions.  But I have been wondering lately:  If he were, would poll numbers like these be one of the results?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being one for conspiracy theories, I have been somewhat skeptical about the idea that George Soros is attempting to discredit our institutions.  But I have been wondering lately:  If he were, would poll numbers like these be one of the results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dclydew</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90137</link>
		<dc:creator>dclydew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90137</guid>
		<description>Oh and I second you on Congress as well... just in case anyone thought I was only Bush Bashing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I second you on Congress as well&#8230; just in case anyone thought I was only Bush Bashing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dclydew</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90136</link>
		<dc:creator>dclydew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/10/04/alan-fram-poll-analyst-for-the-ap/#comment-90136</guid>
		<description>Roger,

I agree with you, a very large part of Bush&#039;s problems seem directly tied to his poor communication skills.

Hopefully the next President will realize that running the White House like a corporation just doesn&#039;t work. The administration needs to provide information, not try to spin things to look good... with the advent of the Internet, that sort of stuff doesn&#039;t fly any longer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>I agree with you, a very large part of Bush&#8217;s problems seem directly tied to his poor communication skills.</p>
<p>Hopefully the next President will realize that running the White House like a corporation just doesn&#8217;t work. The administration needs to provide information, not try to spin things to look good&#8230; with the advent of the Internet, that sort of stuff doesn&#8217;t fly any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

