<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2007/09/16/why-the-rinky-dink-antiwar-demonstrations/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:16:45 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why the Rinky Dink Antiwar Demonstrations</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The propagandists at Xinhua say there were &amp;#8220;tens of thousands&amp;#8221; at the DC antiwar demonstration yesterday.  The VOA says more like five thousand. However many people you agree showed up &amp;#8211; the AP  says &amp;#8220;several&amp;#8221; thousand &amp;#8211; the number is pretty pathetic.  In a country of three hundred million, if you can&amp;#8217;t muster up even fifty thousand people against a war, the event is basically meaningless, barely even news. You could probably drum up more than that for fly-fisherman&amp;#8217;s rights.  (From having been at many demonstrations, my eyeballs tell me even the VOA number is exaggerated.)]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:05:56 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2007/09/16/why-the-rinky-dink-antiwar-demonstrations-n214480</link></item></channel></rss>