<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/08/17/the-future-will-be-photoshopped/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:07:13 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The future will be Photoshopped</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Gal Mor&amp;#8217;s article on YNet asks if fauxtography is going to be par for the course in conflicts of the future?  I wouldn&amp;#8217;t be surprised.  But I think it would be worth our whiles to  look into the past as well.  My guess is that many famous war photographs pre-Photoshop were faux in their own way (staged), even famous ones like the Robert Capa dying soldier in the Spanish Civil War and the napalmed child in Vietnam.  We all know Mohammed al-Doura was a complete phony.  No one needed to Photoshop that.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:04:25 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/08/17/the-future-will-be-photoshopped-n212898</link></item></channel></rss>