<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/06/02/oriana-in-the-new-yorker/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:40:24 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Oriana in The New Yorker</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I was going to comment on the Margot Talbot interview of Oriana Fallaci in The  New Yorker, but  Stephen @ Horsefeathers has said amost everything I thought  and more. He has done a great job of deconstructing the puerile post-9/11 weltanschauung of the once-great magazine.  Everything has shifted.  Why not The New Yorker? But I will add this.  I detected in the weakness of Talbot&amp;#8217;s arguments  &amp;#8211; and maybe this was projection &amp;#8211; a distinct subtextual envy of Fallaci.  And why not again?  Oriana is everything today&amp;#8217;s New Yorker New Yorker isn&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8211; determined, passionate, moral.  Although I have never met her, when Fallaci dies,  I will be in mourning.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:24:15 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/06/02/oriana-in-the-new-yorker-n212364</link></item></channel></rss>