Comments on: Talking, Talking, Talking Happy Talk (with Iran)

By: Section9

Section9 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 02:12:53 +0000

One of the things that needs to be remembered is that this proposal is not designed to be accepted by the Iranians, it’s designed to prove to the Eurotrash and the Russians that the Persian Fuhrer is more interested in Bomb than Boiling Water with Nuclear Energy.

Rice knows that Dimestore Adolf will reject the proposal, or use delaying tactics. That’s understood. This is a peace offensive designed to put Dinner Jacket on the defensive. Greg Djerejian gave her well deserved props for realizing that we had a losing hand and adjusting accordingly. Look for the Usual Suspects on the Left to be upset with all this. Speaking of which…

Do any of you realize how many people over at Huff n Puff and Yglesias are upset with Rice that she didn’t propose that we surrender unconditionally to the Islamonazis to show our good faith? They see this proposal as some sort of trick so that Chimpy McBushhitler and Cheney McHalliburton can Dupe America Into War to Protect the Zionists.

As an aside, you all should have seen when poor Beinart tried to peddle his “Let’s all go back to Harry Truman, ’cause only Liberals know how to Win the War on Terror” nonsense on Huff n’ Puff. They were all over him like a bunch of Red Guards on a Deviationist during the Cultural Revolution!
He walked out of there with a Big Character Dunce Cap on his head….

By: Gary Rosen

Gary Rosen — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 04:58:21 +0000

Kevin(re Shochu John):

“… state what you beleive so we can have a serious discussion.”

Kevin, you are as likely to have a “serious discussion” with SJ as with PeeWee Herman, the man in the moon, or Ahmedinejad himself.

By: Doug S.

Doug S. — Wed, 31 May 2006 20:16:59 +0000

Apropos Kevin Peters’ comment, there was a post yesterday on Counterterrorism Blog linking (once-removed) to a Der Spiegel report that German Neo-Nazis are planning to rally at the World Cup in support of the current government of Iran. That factoid says a lot about who is on what side these days.

By: Kevin Peters

Kevin Peters — Wed, 31 May 2006 17:37:16 +0000

Schochu John:
Let’s get down to basics. You beleive that Iran is not trying to get the bomb. You believe that Iran only has peaceful intentions with their nuclear program. In short, you think that Iran is telling the truth and the U.N., the IAEA, the E.U. big three are all lying. You trust the man who claims the Holocaust is a myth. You trust the man who thinks the C.I. A and the Jews were behind 9-11. If you don’t beleive what I just wrote then state what you beleive so we can have a serious discussion.

By: HA

HA — Wed, 31 May 2006 17:00:09 +0000

I can see how these negotations will go:

Iran: “Death to America!”

America: “Let’s compromise. How ’bout a slow death to America?”

By: Anthony (Los Angeles)

Anthony (Los Angeles) — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:54:00 +0000

From the looks of it, the American conditions are designed to be rejected by Iran outright.

By: Shochu John

Shochu John — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:48:17 +0000

I don’t know, Kevin. If history is really going to repeat itself, that story would not end with Iran annoucing they have the bomb, but us announcing they have the bomb, them denying it, and us calling them liars. After the subsequent invasion, we discover they don’t have the bomb.

WorldNetDaily proclaims the bomb is in the Bekaa Valley.

By: Kevin Peters

Kevin Peters — Wed, 31 May 2006 16:25:21 +0000

Roger:

Iran agrees to susupend development. Talks begin. IAEA verification teams are denied entry into certain locations.The big A calls them Zionist spys. Talks about the verification regime start. Iran kicks out inspectors. The west calls for more negotiations to get the verification negotiations started so that the final negotiations can begin. Democrats blame Bush for unilateral stubborness and call for new multi lateral talks. This goes on for 1 to 3 years. Iran announces they have the bomb.

By: Bill Baar

Bill Baar — Wed, 31 May 2006 15:30:39 +0000

Time to quote Abbas Hakim Zadeh:

Yesterday, Mr. Zadeh said the country's largest student organization,Takhim Vahdat, rejected any direct talks between America and Iran if the negotiations centered around security guarantees in exchange for promises on nuclear enrichment. "However if the idea is for Iran to get security guarantees embedded in it that the regime can suppress the human rights and the will of the people, that is something the Iranian student movement, the Iranian labor movement and the Iranian women's rights groups reject firmly and totally."