<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/05/17/crix-nix-da-vinci-pix/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:19:49 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Crix Nix Da Vinci Pix</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Well, not just the critics are knocking the new film version of The Da Vinci Code, the flick&amp;#8217;s own actors are doing it as well.  Ian McKellen, who has been getting raves for his work in the film, calls Dan Brown and his story &amp;#8220;codswallop,&amp;#8221; according to The Guardian. What is &amp;#8220;codswallop,&amp;#8221; you may ask?  Answer here.  I&amp;#8217;ll check it out over the weekend to see if I think it&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;codswallop&amp;#8221; as well.  I suspect it is.  But the question is &amp;#8211; is it good &amp;#8220;codswallop&amp;#8221;?]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 21:29:03 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/05/17/crix-nix-da-vinci-pix-n212249</link></item></channel></rss>