<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/04/28/in-defense-of-the-political-hybrid/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 02:08:07 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>In defense of the (political) hybrid</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald has a post today in which he quite graciously acknowledges my apology to Kos of yesterday.  (Thank you, Glenn).  He also goes on to make a well-reasoned, well-written case for the necessity of lumping people into broad political categories.  This is, of course, the conventional wisdom and I don&amp;#8217;t think I need to rehearse the argument here.  You can click to Glenn for that, but for the most part, you already know it.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:37:52 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/04/28/in-defense-of-the-political-hybrid-n212116</link></item></channel></rss>