<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/03/26/wmds-what-again/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:10:37 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>WMDs (what again?)</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The release of the Saddam documents has made me think (alas, again) about the WMD issue, which we could call the &amp;#8220;Great Gotcha&amp;#8221; of the Iraq War.  It&amp;#8217;s all about politics and little about itself, about reality. In other words, leaving aside partisan gain, ask yourself to what extent would Saddam eventually have had significant WMDs and should we have been worried about that?  The documents are showing us many things related to this issue so far, but two appear to be particularly important:  1. Saddam&amp;#8217;s willingness to work with and encourage terror organizations when he felt like it.  (See Stephen Hayes&amp;#8217; Camp Saddam)  2.  His continued interest in WMDs via Russian and Turkish scientists, who were &amp;#8211; if the documents are to be believed and let&amp;#8217;s assume for the moment they are &amp;#8211; working in Iraq right under the noses of the UN inspectors.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:15:41 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/03/26/wmds-what-again-n211793</link></item></channel></rss>