<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2006/02/27/a-ports-conspiracy/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:03:53 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>A ports conspiracy?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Jim Geraghty thinks so.  He&amp;#8217;s seemingly supported by USA Today, which points out that 80% of the Port of Los Angeles is run by foreign firms.  According to the blog Sweetness and Light, berths at the ports of Baltimore, Newport News, Houston, New Orleans, Savannah, Wilmington, N.C., Port Newark, New Jersey, and Brooklyn, New York are already run by&amp;#8230; the National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:53:49 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2006/02/27/a-ports-conspiracy-n211511</link></item></channel></rss>