Comments on: It’s about ‘earl’

By: rkburk

rkburk — Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:23:31 +0000

Ergo, sanctions would be a great way to shoot ourselves in the foot while doing nothing to stop the Iranian nuclear program

There is internal unrest in Iran over 25% unemployment – higher in the big demographic bulge of young adults. Economic sanctions, if carefully tied to the threats of the leaders, might well exacerbate that unemployment in ways that would increase that unrest.

ANWR. Nuclear power generation. Clean coal. Hybrid cards for local driving. All of these and more, along with polymerization plants etc. Yes, we can and should be moving to these quickly.

By: Luther McLeod

Luther McLeod — Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:30:00 +0000

Interesting Yehudit. I had read of this process some time ago but had seen no updates.

Using figures from the “answers” site, if we converted half the US waste each year we would have a net gain of approximately 3 and a half billion barrels per year over current use, as well as mitigating a host of other problems. Let’s hope it succeeds.

By: Yehudit

Yehudit — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:23:53 +0000

Thermal depolymerization. You can throw anything carbon-based into one end and get oil and water out the other end. Porcesses all waste except radioactive, including medical waste. 85% efficiency. Powers itself. Almost commercially viable here. Probably would be profitable in Japan right now.

By: Soldier's Dad

Soldier's Dad — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:37:49 +0000

Between the US,EU and Japan. There is 1.3 Billion Barrels of Oil in Strategic Petroleum Reserves. Irans net-exports are 2 million barrels per day. Acting alone, Iran can manage to bump the price of oil a bit. It would require a partner, say Venezuela to actually have any significant impact.

As far as alternative energy is concerned, according to the DOE, only 3% of US electricity comes from oil. The big problem is cars, oil has a very good (weight-bulk)/energy ratio, that makes it ideally suited to vehicles that must carry their own energy source. At $10/gallon, gas guzzling vehicles will become driveway ornaments.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pecss_diagram.html

By: ras

ras — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:33:30 +0000

How long now before Old Europe offically requests to join the Star Wars program?

By: Terrye

Terrye — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:12:48 +0000

How about ANWR.

And please no excuses about how short term it is or whatever. It could ease the concerns of markets to know a major oil field will be coming on.

Of course nuclear power in the long term would help even more.

It would be nice if we could render middle eastern oil worthless. The wealth has done them no good and it has threatened the world.

By: Shochu John

Shochu John — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:41:35 +0000

Roger certainly has a capital suggestion on developing alternative energy sources. I am not sure that any program can be quite crash enough to move the pieces around the board much in this particular game. As a long-term strategy, however, reducing oil dependence is a great idea from several standpoints, not least of which is national security. In the here and now, however, we and our allies need to buy Iran’s oil more than they need to sell it to us. Back in the early 50′s, when Mohammed Mossadegh was nationalizing the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company’s infrastructure, a British diplomat approached a religious leader seeking support, telling him that Iranian oil exports could suffer severely. He angrily responded that, “It [the oil] can stay in the ground for all I care!” Does anyone think that much has changed in the last 50 years on that count? If it came between choosing oil profits and choosing national pride and perceived security, Iran would choose the latter. Ergo, sanctions would be a great way to shoot ourselves in the foot while doing nothing to stop the Iranian nuclear program. Then, of course, there are air strikes, which would make things pretty spicy in southern Iraq while they may or may not actually set them back much. Does it make sense to do something that is so high risk with such a large potential downside, bearing in mind, of course, that nuclear weapons, if they are the goal, are a long way off. Then, of course, there’s invasion, which nobody except the dumbest neocon types actually support. All in all, none of these solutions appear effective.

By: ForNow

ForNow — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:09:55 +0000

Saudi Arabia can increase its production of oil to some extent. It’s the only country that can do this to such an extent that Iran could end up hurting itself by raising its oil price. So Iran might look to Venezuela for coordinated price increase, but still the Saudis could probably cause it to boomerang on them. So we will be pressuring the Saudis to do this in the event of an Iranian geopolitics-based price increase.

By: ForNow

ForNow — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:57:40 +0000

Sorry, that's http://www.markta.co.uk/alien/screens3/alien_063.JPG

By: ForNow

ForNow — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:56:59 +0000

Try to pull the thing off, and it tightens its tail around the neck of the victim whom it feeds oxygen and in whom it is implanting its vile spawn.

http://www.markta.co.uk/alien/screens3/alien_063.JPG

As an image, it works even bigger-time with Saudi Arabia.