<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Munitions for Mullahs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:23:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dougf</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65696</link>
		<dc:creator>dougf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65696</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Russian weapons? We should insist they buy some before we invade...&lt;/i&gt;--Richard Mc.



Both funny and true.



Frankly the best thing that could happen is if Iran spends all its OIL money on Russian junk. The weapons would be of marginal use in any conceivable combat situation and the diversion of resources from useful economic development would further weaken the kleptocracy there.



It&#039;s not Russian weapons that that are the problem in Iran. It&#039;s the lunatics in charge and their support of terror.



As for Russia --- it&#039;s a lost cause. A 2nd rate has-been rapidly regressing to a 3rd world criminal state. It&#039;s BAD news, and it has LOTS of nukes. Right now it runs on its Oil exports, but without those, it is a basket case in training.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Russian weapons? We should insist they buy some before we invade&#8230;</i>&#8211;Richard Mc.</p>
<p>Both funny and true.</p>
<p>Frankly the best thing that could happen is if Iran spends all its OIL money on Russian junk. The weapons would be of marginal use in any conceivable combat situation and the diversion of resources from useful economic development would further weaken the kleptocracy there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not Russian weapons that that are the problem in Iran. It&#8217;s the lunatics in charge and their support of terror.</p>
<p>As for Russia &#8212; it&#8217;s a lost cause. A 2nd rate has-been rapidly regressing to a 3rd world criminal state. It&#8217;s BAD news, and it has LOTS of nukes. Right now it runs on its Oil exports, but without those, it is a basket case in training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony (Los Angeles)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65695</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony (Los Angeles)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65695</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why anyone should be surprised the Russians are selling weapons to the Persian Nazis. After all, how else are they going to replace the bribes Saddam used to give them?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why anyone should be surprised the Russians are selling weapons to the Persian Nazis. After all, how else are they going to replace the bribes Saddam used to give them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exmaple</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65694</link>
		<dc:creator>exmaple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65694</guid>
		<description>What does Russia have that anyone will buy?



1.  Weapons.



2.  Nuclear technology.



3.  Oil.



4.  Vodka.



Nos. 3 &amp; 4 Iran unlikely to buy.



It&#039;s about the money.



There could be bribery too.  On Saddam&#039;s Oil Coupon list were several Russian parties and politicians.  Iran likely bribing the Russians the same.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Russia have that anyone will buy?</p>
<p>1.  Weapons.</p>
<p>2.  Nuclear technology.</p>
<p>3.  Oil.</p>
<p>4.  Vodka.</p>
<p>Nos. 3 &amp; 4 Iran unlikely to buy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about the money.</p>
<p>There could be bribery too.  On Saddam&#8217;s Oil Coupon list were several Russian parties and politicians.  Iran likely bribing the Russians the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65693</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65693</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Russian&lt;/i&gt; weapons?  We should &lt;i&gt;insist&lt;/i&gt; they buy some before we invade...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Russian</i> weapons?  We should <i>insist</i> they buy some before we invade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thibaud</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65692</link>
		<dc:creator>thibaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65692</guid>
		<description>This should not shock anyone. First, it&#039;s not at all clear that any nation occupying Russia&#039;s geopolitical position would welcome the extraordinary increase in US influence and military presence all across Russia&#039;s multiple backyards.



The US and NATO now has or is preparing relatively new forward deployments in (starting from the west and moving east)

--Poland

--Romania

--Bulgaria

--Georgia

--Iraq

--Afghanistan

--Uzbekistan



If China were to one day develop forward deployments in, say, not just Venezuela but also Cuba, Colombia (soon to be formerly Russian) Kamchatka, and Indonesia, I daresay our military establishment would be a mite alarmed and seeking ways to kick back.



And get kickbacks. Remember, Putin&#039;s barely in charge. When you talk about weapons sales from Russia, you&#039;re referring to sales by dozens of groups that are, in effect, quasi-privatized, entrepreneurial concerns run by all kinds of military, foreign ministry and FSB (ex-KGB) characters operating without much central control. Of course Putin gets his cut, but I think it&#039;s likely that he&#039;s little more than a puppet. No Russian president today can really rein in the criminalized Russian state and its security services.



I&#039;d peg the chances of Russia taking our side vs the mullahs at less than 10%. Not being cynical, just assessing the situation honestly and realistically.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should not shock anyone. First, it&#8217;s not at all clear that any nation occupying Russia&#8217;s geopolitical position would welcome the extraordinary increase in US influence and military presence all across Russia&#8217;s multiple backyards.</p>
<p>The US and NATO now has or is preparing relatively new forward deployments in (starting from the west and moving east)</p>
<p>&#8211;Poland</p>
<p>&#8211;Romania</p>
<p>&#8211;Bulgaria</p>
<p>&#8211;Georgia</p>
<p>&#8211;Iraq</p>
<p>&#8211;Afghanistan</p>
<p>&#8211;Uzbekistan</p>
<p>If China were to one day develop forward deployments in, say, not just Venezuela but also Cuba, Colombia (soon to be formerly Russian) Kamchatka, and Indonesia, I daresay our military establishment would be a mite alarmed and seeking ways to kick back.</p>
<p>And get kickbacks. Remember, Putin&#8217;s barely in charge. When you talk about weapons sales from Russia, you&#8217;re referring to sales by dozens of groups that are, in effect, quasi-privatized, entrepreneurial concerns run by all kinds of military, foreign ministry and FSB (ex-KGB) characters operating without much central control. Of course Putin gets his cut, but I think it&#8217;s likely that he&#8217;s little more than a puppet. No Russian president today can really rein in the criminalized Russian state and its security services.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d peg the chances of Russia taking our side vs the mullahs at less than 10%. Not being cynical, just assessing the situation honestly and realistically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacRim Jim</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65691</link>
		<dc:creator>PacRim Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/munitions-for-mullahs/#comment-65691</guid>
		<description>Russian weapons? Wait six hours until the rust before attacking. No matter how much Iran were to arm, it would be ill prepared to face an integrated assault. Just bigger booms.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian weapons? Wait six hours until the rust before attacking. No matter how much Iran were to arm, it would be ill prepared to face an integrated assault. Just bigger booms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

