<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a Nokia World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/its-a-nokia-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/its-a-nokia-world/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/its-a-nokia-world/#comment-65671</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/09/29/its-a-nokia-world/#comment-65671</guid>
		<description>I have no idea, and am too lazy to try to figure out, how the WEF goes about making this list.  It would seem reasonable that this &quot;Growth Competiveness Index&quot; would index some measures of competiveness and growth.  Nimbleness is normally associated with competitiveness.  Growth, at least when talking about money, is typically measured as a percentage.



I find it unsurprising, therefore, that 10 of the top 12 are quite small countries.  Small is often useful where nimbleness is required.  It is also somewhat helpful when % growth is required (it can be much easier to grow someting by 4% when beginning with a small baseline than it can when beginning with a large baseline - particularly a huge baseline).



The US is #2, Japan #12.  Those are the only large nations in the top dozen.  We start to pick up the large countries after the top dozen spots.



How does a behemoth like the US manage to be #2(!) and a semi behemoth like Japan #12?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea, and am too lazy to try to figure out, how the WEF goes about making this list.  It would seem reasonable that this &#8220;Growth Competiveness Index&#8221; would index some measures of competiveness and growth.  Nimbleness is normally associated with competitiveness.  Growth, at least when talking about money, is typically measured as a percentage.</p>
<p>I find it unsurprising, therefore, that 10 of the top 12 are quite small countries.  Small is often useful where nimbleness is required.  It is also somewhat helpful when % growth is required (it can be much easier to grow someting by 4% when beginning with a small baseline than it can when beginning with a large baseline &#8211; particularly a huge baseline).</p>
<p>The US is #2, Japan #12.  Those are the only large nations in the top dozen.  We start to pick up the large countries after the top dozen spots.</p>
<p>How does a behemoth like the US manage to be #2(!) and a semi behemoth like Japan #12?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

