<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/05/18/which-side-are-you-on-filibuster-division/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:30:52 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Which Side Are You On - Filibuster Division</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[When it comes to the filibuster, I&amp;#8217;m a regular flip-flopper. I can&amp;#8217;t figure out where I stand on this issue. But neither, evidently, can the New York Times.  Nowadays, they find a filibuster rule change abhorrent.  But back in the early days of our republic&amp;#8230; 1995&amp;#8230; they felt rather differently.  Here&amp;#8217;s their editorial from January 1 of that year:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 07:54:27 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2005/05/18/which-side-are-you-on-filibuster-division-n208098</link></item></channel></rss>