<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breitbart Statement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C'Mon.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46596</link>
		<dc:creator>C'Mon.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46596</guid>
		<description>Quote:



&quot;Matt Drudge, a man who will rightfully take his place in the history books as an Internet news pioneer.&quot;





Is that a nice way of saying &quot;I kiss Drudge&#039;s butt even though he has no standards of accuracy or ethics&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Matt Drudge, a man who will rightfully take his place in the history books as an Internet news pioneer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that a nice way of saying &#8220;I kiss Drudge&#8217;s butt even though he has no standards of accuracy or ethics&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46595</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 03:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46595</guid>
		<description>That was a pretty weak come-back, marky.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a pretty weak come-back, marky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky48</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46594</link>
		<dc:creator>marky48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 01:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46594</guid>
		<description>Well I suppose you could attack her ideas for a change. As far as dumb asses there&#039;s one I can think of, however the option is open for proof of something else.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I suppose you could attack her ideas for a change. As far as dumb asses there&#8217;s one I can think of, however the option is open for proof of something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Curley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46593</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Curley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46593</guid>
		<description>What other choices are there, marky?  We can sing the praises of Arianna&#039;s brilliance or bemoan her idiocy.  We can project success or failure for her new venture, or we can be really boring and admit that none of us knows how it will all turn out.



And it&#039;s not as if you&#039;ve added any food for thought to the discussion.  You&#039;ve critiqued without any substance, which ironically appears to be your beef against this post and the comments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What other choices are there, marky?  We can sing the praises of Arianna&#8217;s brilliance or bemoan her idiocy.  We can project success or failure for her new venture, or we can be really boring and admit that none of us knows how it will all turn out.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not as if you&#8217;ve added any food for thought to the discussion.  You&#8217;ve critiqued without any substance, which ironically appears to be your beef against this post and the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy Larsen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46592</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 05:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46592</guid>
		<description>Hey, Mr. Intelligent, it&#039;s &quot;vigilante&quot;. (sigh) So hard to find decent dumb-asses these days.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Mr. Intelligent, it&#8217;s &#8220;vigilante&#8221;. (sigh) So hard to find decent dumb-asses these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky48</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46591</link>
		<dc:creator>marky48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46591</guid>
		<description>Intelligent? Au contraire. Vigilanti is more like it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent? Au contraire. Vigilanti is more like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JenLArt</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46590</link>
		<dc:creator>JenLArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46590</guid>
		<description>Neither is wisdom the automatic gainsaying of one&#039;s opponent.



If the continual &quot;pooh-poohing&quot; of the intelligent remarks on this good blog is your idea of smart commentary, markymark, you&#039;ve come to the wrong place and belong with your peers at DemocratUnderground(DUh.com).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither is wisdom the automatic gainsaying of one&#8217;s opponent.</p>
<p>If the continual &#8220;pooh-poohing&#8221; of the intelligent remarks on this good blog is your idea of smart commentary, markymark, you&#8217;ve come to the wrong place and belong with your peers at DemocratUnderground(DUh.com).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marky48</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46589</link>
		<dc:creator>marky48</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46589</guid>
		<description>I call em like I seeum. If you&#039;re content with just being a bashing cabal have at it. It&#039;s protected speech, but it ain&#039;t wisdom.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call em like I seeum. If you&#8217;re content with just being a bashing cabal have at it. It&#8217;s protected speech, but it ain&#8217;t wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JenLArt</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46588</link>
		<dc:creator>JenLArt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46588</guid>
		<description>I think it will be like Barbra Streisand&#039;s &quot;Truth Alerts&quot; x 250.

(Or DUh.com with a face lift and Pellegrino.)

Breibart will regret this, as he will be the &quot;odd man out.&quot;

Maybe he just wants a front row seat for Implosion Hollywood.

God knows they&#039;re not busy making good films!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will be like Barbra Streisand&#8217;s &#8220;Truth Alerts&#8221; x 250.</p>
<p>(Or DUh.com with a face lift and Pellegrino.)</p>
<p>Breibart will regret this, as he will be the &#8220;odd man out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe he just wants a front row seat for Implosion Hollywood.</p>
<p>God knows they&#8217;re not busy making good films!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerHawk</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46587</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/26/breitbart-statement/#comment-46587</guid>
		<description>The quality of the posts put up on Huffington&#039;s blog collective will be inversely related to the prominance of the poster.  A lot of these guys will write very bland stuff, because they will not want to &quot;sacrifice their reputation&quot; by saying what they &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; think.  Others of them do not really think, so they won&#039;t write anything interesting either.  However, I confess as well to great interest in the project.  If it is truly a blog -- with links, trackbacks, comments -- and in the &lt;em&gt;spirit&lt;/em&gt; of a blog (i.e., revealing the personality of the contributors, with real interaction), it will be a lot of fun.  Perhaps a fisk-o-rama, but a lot of fun nonetheless.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the posts put up on Huffington&#8217;s blog collective will be inversely related to the prominance of the poster.  A lot of these guys will write very bland stuff, because they will not want to &#8220;sacrifice their reputation&#8221; by saying what they <em>really</em> think.  Others of them do not really think, so they won&#8217;t write anything interesting either.  However, I confess as well to great interest in the project.  If it is truly a blog &#8212; with links, trackbacks, comments &#8212; and in the <em>spirit</em> of a blog (i.e., revealing the personality of the contributors, with real interaction), it will be a lot of fun.  Perhaps a fisk-o-rama, but a lot of fun nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

