<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Reason Not To Read &#8220;The Trades&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/#comment-44657</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/#comment-44657</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not in the entertainment business but the idiocy in many trade rags is similar.  I don&#039;t bother renewing even free subscriptions anymore.  Once upon a time they were the only source for industry information, news, and analysis.  It took me forever to realize that I could not count on any better reporting or analysis of those portions of the subject industry than I saw in the portions about which I actually knew stuff.  It finally sunk through my thick skull that if they couldn&#039;t get it right, or something better than uselessly shallow, in those areas I had some level of expertise, then there was no good reason to believe reading the stuff I didn&#039;t know anything about, but wanted to learn, since it was surely equally shallow and/or incorrect.



Thank goodness for blogs!  You gonna crank up and trade blograg, Roger?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not in the entertainment business but the idiocy in many trade rags is similar.  I don&#8217;t bother renewing even free subscriptions anymore.  Once upon a time they were the only source for industry information, news, and analysis.  It took me forever to realize that I could not count on any better reporting or analysis of those portions of the subject industry than I saw in the portions about which I actually knew stuff.  It finally sunk through my thick skull that if they couldn&#8217;t get it right, or something better than uselessly shallow, in those areas I had some level of expertise, then there was no good reason to believe reading the stuff I didn&#8217;t know anything about, but wanted to learn, since it was surely equally shallow and/or incorrect.</p>
<p>Thank goodness for blogs!  You gonna crank up and trade blograg, Roger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyster</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/#comment-44656</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/04/08/another-reason-not-to-read-the-trades/#comment-44656</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty funny.  How do you put up with it, Roger?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty funny.  How do you put up with it, Roger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

