<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oil-for-Food &#8211; Here We Go Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedrury</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42945</link>
		<dc:creator>jedrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42945</guid>
		<description>What will drive this story are further revelations. Forget the Mainstream media; this

is not Times story or a Peter Jennings/PBS type story. Look to Norman Coleman&#039;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Government Operations, the Wall Street Journal and Claudia Rossett.



What drove the Clinton/Monica/Whitewater story for months and months was alternate press coverage and revelations.



Realities:



No one who ever read a good mystery believed Kojo Annan only got $ 180,000. This is peanuts.



Last night on Fox, I heard that Benon Sevan&#039;s attorneys&#039; fees were paid for by the UN. Somehow there is a conflict of interest there.



How much and how were they retained and,  most importantly, why did the UN cough up for Benan&#039;s defense when he was the face of wrong doing?












</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will drive this story are further revelations. Forget the Mainstream media; this</p>
<p>is not Times story or a Peter Jennings/PBS type story. Look to Norman Coleman&#8217;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Government Operations, the Wall Street Journal and Claudia Rossett.</p>
<p>What drove the Clinton/Monica/Whitewater story for months and months was alternate press coverage and revelations.</p>
<p>Realities:</p>
<p>No one who ever read a good mystery believed Kojo Annan only got $ 180,000. This is peanuts.</p>
<p>Last night on Fox, I heard that Benon Sevan&#8217;s attorneys&#8217; fees were paid for by the UN. Somehow there is a conflict of interest there.</p>
<p>How much and how were they retained and,  most importantly, why did the UN cough up for Benan&#8217;s defense when he was the face of wrong doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42944</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42944</guid>
		<description>Kofi Annan will not be fired.  He will not resign.  He has no reason to.  The UN has no mandated outside accountability. In the words of Al Gore, the is &quot;no controlling legal authority.&quot;



The only hammers we can swing are financial pressure and noncompliance.  Both have limits.  The UN wants our money, but can get money from other nations, ironically, money those nations may have received from us through global trade.  Noncompliance provides our enemies internal and external with propaganda ammunition.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kofi Annan will not be fired.  He will not resign.  He has no reason to.  The UN has no mandated outside accountability. In the words of Al Gore, the is &#8220;no controlling legal authority.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only hammers we can swing are financial pressure and noncompliance.  Both have limits.  The UN wants our money, but can get money from other nations, ironically, money those nations may have received from us through global trade.  Noncompliance provides our enemies internal and external with propaganda ammunition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42943</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42943</guid>
		<description>I would nominate Havel from the Czech Republic to head the UN.  He understands the dark side of tyranny, centralized planning, political oppression and the power of freedom.  He is also an intellectual who has the skill to communicate these ideas and values.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would nominate Havel from the Czech Republic to head the UN.  He understands the dark side of tyranny, centralized planning, political oppression and the power of freedom.  He is also an intellectual who has the skill to communicate these ideas and values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrett</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42942</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42942</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that Kofi has unveiled the latest iteration of the Great Society in his latest &quot;reform&quot; plan for the UN.  The core belief in the plan is that central planning and more money (i.e. your money) are the keys to success.



This is a throughly discredited idea for anyone who wants to look at the past 100 years of history.  In the US, Johnson&#039;s Great Society increased the transfer of wealth and only entrenched the poor and heightened the victimization business.  Europe is buckling under the weight of its social spending and aging population.  The Soviet Union failed.  Do we need to go on?



Kofi should be fired.  The US should withhold all funds until we get the required reforms or junk the whole thing all together.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that Kofi has unveiled the latest iteration of the Great Society in his latest &#8220;reform&#8221; plan for the UN.  The core belief in the plan is that central planning and more money (i.e. your money) are the keys to success.</p>
<p>This is a throughly discredited idea for anyone who wants to look at the past 100 years of history.  In the US, Johnson&#8217;s Great Society increased the transfer of wealth and only entrenched the poor and heightened the victimization business.  Europe is buckling under the weight of its social spending and aging population.  The Soviet Union failed.  Do we need to go on?</p>
<p>Kofi should be fired.  The US should withhold all funds until we get the required reforms or junk the whole thing all together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Evans</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42941</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42941</guid>
		<description>*It&#039;s Mrs. Arafat who is highly eligible...*



And soooooo sexy...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*It&#8217;s Mrs. Arafat who is highly eligible&#8230;*</p>
<p>And soooooo sexy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42940</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42940</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder what they discuss (teach?) at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nmun.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;National Model United Nations&lt;/a&gt; conference.



&lt;blockquote&gt;The National Model United Nations conference (NMUN) is the worldÔøΩs largest university-level simulation of the United Nations. NMUN annually educates more than 3,200 students (50% from outside the United States) about the United Nations and other contemporary international issues&lt;/blockquote&gt;



I made a quick scan of Don Kofi&#039;s introductory letter and that of the NMUN Secretary General.  Not the slightest hint that the UN needs to concern itself with institutional corruption or even ineffectiveness.  Nope, instead we get mindless platitudes like:



&lt;blockquote&gt;The theme for the 2005 NMUN conference is simple but profound.  In the words of A.J. Muste:  &quot;There is no way to peace.  Peace is the way.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;



With all due respect to Ms. Rachel Holmes, Secretary-General of the 2005 NMUN (no doubt she&#039;s a fine young woman) the above message is not simple, it is simplistic.  It is not profound, it is utterly meaningless and disposable.



I scanned the extensive &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nmun.org/download/2005%20NMUN%20%20Conference%20Program_final.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2005 NMUN program&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; committee topics and program schedule and did not spot a single item that indicated there might be even the shallowest discussion of dealing with UN&#039;s internal problems.  I suppose I can hope that this is a matter of not wishing to publicly air one&#039;s dirty laundry and such topic will be be discretely discussed during the 4 days of activities.  It&#039;s not silly of me to hope for such a thing, is it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder what they discuss (teach?) at the <a href="http://www.nmun.org/" rel="nofollow">National Model United Nations</a> conference.</p>
<blockquote><p>The National Model United Nations conference (NMUN) is the worldÔøΩs largest university-level simulation of the United Nations. NMUN annually educates more than 3,200 students (50% from outside the United States) about the United Nations and other contemporary international issues</p></blockquote>
<p>I made a quick scan of Don Kofi&#8217;s introductory letter and that of the NMUN Secretary General.  Not the slightest hint that the UN needs to concern itself with institutional corruption or even ineffectiveness.  Nope, instead we get mindless platitudes like:</p>
<blockquote><p>The theme for the 2005 NMUN conference is simple but profound.  In the words of A.J. Muste:  &#8220;There is no way to peace.  Peace is the way.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>With all due respect to Ms. Rachel Holmes, Secretary-General of the 2005 NMUN (no doubt she&#8217;s a fine young woman) the above message is not simple, it is simplistic.  It is not profound, it is utterly meaningless and disposable.</p>
<p>I scanned the extensive <a href="http://www.nmun.org/download/2005%20NMUN%20%20Conference%20Program_final.pdf" rel="nofollow">2005 NMUN program&#8217;s</a> committee topics and program schedule and did not spot a single item that indicated there might be even the shallowest discussion of dealing with UN&#8217;s internal problems.  I suppose I can hope that this is a matter of not wishing to publicly air one&#8217;s dirty laundry and such topic will be be discretely discussed during the 4 days of activities.  It&#8217;s not silly of me to hope for such a thing, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanC</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42939</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42939</guid>
		<description>&quot;.....that corroborates some information this blog is not yet at liberty to disclose. More, I hope, will be coming from here soon--from &quot;sources close to the investigation,&quot; as the saying goes. Meanwhile....&quot;



Tantalizing. Yep it is that.



But, this also strikes me as though we might be delving into the realm of &quot;real&quot; journalism here.



You know, investigating issues and reporting original stuff. Are Blogs allowed to do that?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;..that corroborates some information this blog is not yet at liberty to disclose. More, I hope, will be coming from here soon&#8211;from &#8220;sources close to the investigation,&#8221; as the saying goes. Meanwhile&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tantalizing. Yep it is that.</p>
<p>But, this also strikes me as though we might be delving into the realm of &#8220;real&#8221; journalism here.</p>
<p>You know, investigating issues and reporting original stuff. Are Blogs allowed to do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exguru</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42938</link>
		<dc:creator>exguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42938</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Mrs. Arafat who is highly eligible...



Amazing to me Kofi has lasted this long.  Won&#039;t somebody take him by the scruff of the neck and put him out?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Mrs. Arafat who is highly eligible&#8230;</p>
<p>Amazing to me Kofi has lasted this long.  Won&#8217;t somebody take him by the scruff of the neck and put him out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AST</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42937</link>
		<dc:creator>AST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42937</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing a tee-shirt:



My Dad&#039;s Secretary General of the U.N. and all I got was a lousy 300 grand!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing a tee-shirt:</p>
<p>My Dad&#8217;s Secretary General of the U.N. and all I got was a lousy 300 grand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dishman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42936</link>
		<dc:creator>Dishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/22/oil-for-food-here-we-go-again/#comment-42936</guid>
		<description>Bah, Kofi Annan, King of Corruption, Master of Molesters, Friend to Murderers, legend in his own mind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, Kofi Annan, King of Corruption, Master of Molesters, Friend to Murderers, legend in his own mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

