<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/15/phillip-bennett-responds/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:38:22 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Phillip Bennett Responds</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The other day I was pretty hard on Phillip Bennett about what the Washington Post editor allegedly said in an interview with China&amp;#8217;s People&amp;#8217;s Daily.  Now Bennett has responded to a query from Hugh Hewitt with his own transcription of that interview which does not entirely comport with the one published by the Chinese. I leave it to you to decide what you think of Bennett&amp;#8217;s real statements, but I am curious about what the editor of the Washington Post expected.  I have been interviewed on several occasions by the controled press &amp;#8211; by the Chinese themselves in 1978 and four or five times by Soviet publications between 1986-1990. In every case my words were distorted to one degree or another (they have been here too!).  I was not surprised in any of the cases and back in the &amp;#8217;78 interview it didn&amp;#8217;t even bother me (I was in synch with the Chinese in those days, to some extent anyway). But I was a private citizen &amp;#8212; a left-leaning novelist/screenwriter and fully aware of what was happening.  The Managing Editor of the Washington Post is someone rather different.  He speaks for one of the most important newspapers in America.  I am amazed he could have been so naive, but then maybe I shouldn&amp;#8217;t be.  I believed the interview was accurate.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:55:55 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2005/03/15/phillip-bennett-responds-n207312</link></item></channel></rss>