<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/03/04/et-tu-apple/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 01:47:34 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Et tu, Apple?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The Federal Election Commission is not the only entity looking to reign in bloggers these days.  Apple&amp;#8230; of all companies&amp;#8230; is also trying to restrict us legally. A San Jose, California case instigated by Apple is significant in that it tries to separate blogs from mainstream media regarding the confidentiality sources, although many blogs are starting to make money and the destinction seems moot and largely about technology.  From the San Jose Mercury News:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 11:40:20 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2005/03/04/et-tu-apple-n207176</link></item></channel></rss>