<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official Statement of CNN regarding Eason Jordan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36735</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36735</guid>
		<description>CNN learned an important lesson from the CBS Rather debacle:   blog control.  Apparently, the network is mounting a rapid response of emails and even phone calls to involved bloggers.  They are not offering documentation, and their explanation doesn&#039;t even sound logical, but at least they are trying to stamp out the brushfire before it rages out of control.  Their response is a tacit admission of the power of the &#039;sphere, even though it is insultingly inadequate.  The best bloggers, like Roger!, won&#039;t settle for their specious spin.



Still, CNN must believe they have a chance at plausible deniability and that video or a damaging transcript won&#039;t surface.  Could they be taking care of that end of business, as well? And, anybody hear further from Dems Barney Frank or Chris Dodd who were there that night?  Probably not.



Helveticus&#039; take on what occurred sounds about right.  But I hope there will be some hell to pay for what Jordan said at Davos and, apparently, not for the first time.  May the Cred Nullified News not manage us as well as they &quot;manage&quot; the news.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN learned an important lesson from the CBS Rather debacle:   blog control.  Apparently, the network is mounting a rapid response of emails and even phone calls to involved bloggers.  They are not offering documentation, and their explanation doesn&#8217;t even sound logical, but at least they are trying to stamp out the brushfire before it rages out of control.  Their response is a tacit admission of the power of the &#8216;sphere, even though it is insultingly inadequate.  The best bloggers, like Roger!, won&#8217;t settle for their specious spin.</p>
<p>Still, CNN must believe they have a chance at plausible deniability and that video or a damaging transcript won&#8217;t surface.  Could they be taking care of that end of business, as well? And, anybody hear further from Dems Barney Frank or Chris Dodd who were there that night?  Probably not.</p>
<p>Helveticus&#8217; take on what occurred sounds about right.  But I hope there will be some hell to pay for what Jordan said at Davos and, apparently, not for the first time.  May the Cred Nullified News not manage us as well as they &#8220;manage&#8221; the news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helveticus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36734</link>
		<dc:creator>Helveticus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36734</guid>
		<description>I have been to the Forum in Davos a couple of times, although it&#039;s been a few years since I was last in attendance.  However, I think I understand the dynamics of what happened in this case.  It comes as no surpprise to me that an American would stand up and make some kind of exaggerated anti-American remark within a session, because it is exactly these kinds of comments that will ingratiate him with the rest of the participants, who (this point has been made on many blogs) are themselves virulently anti-US and more than willing to believe even outright lies if they will make the US look bad.



The atmosphere that is cultivated at Davos - maybe not in the big plenary sessions but certainly in the smaller discussions, like this one was - is one of &quot;off-the-record intimacy&quot;.  Does anybody know if there was anyone from the press in the room when Jordan made his remarks? I don&#039;t think so, otherwise this would have been reported somewhere besides through the blogs (and I don&#039;t count Jordan himself as a member of the press, since - I am pretty sure - he was commenting in his role as a featured session speaker, and not as a journalist covering the discussion).  So he may have been taken completely by surprise by the fact that a staff member of the World Economic Forum themselves was blogging the discussion.  Hence the  desperate backpedalling.



In that case, Jordan is like the Dixie Chicks - Americans who start spewing anti-US or at least anti-Bush venom once they&#039;re abroad.  They apparently haven&#039;t figured out that what they say outside the US can still be picked up by bloggers, directly or indirectly, and zapped back to the good old US of A instantaneously.  Then comes the whole &quot;I was misunderstood&quot; shtick.  Pathetic.  Jordan should apologize to the Armed Forces or be sacked.  But we all know he won&#039;t be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been to the Forum in Davos a couple of times, although it&#8217;s been a few years since I was last in attendance.  However, I think I understand the dynamics of what happened in this case.  It comes as no surpprise to me that an American would stand up and make some kind of exaggerated anti-American remark within a session, because it is exactly these kinds of comments that will ingratiate him with the rest of the participants, who (this point has been made on many blogs) are themselves virulently anti-US and more than willing to believe even outright lies if they will make the US look bad.</p>
<p>The atmosphere that is cultivated at Davos &#8211; maybe not in the big plenary sessions but certainly in the smaller discussions, like this one was &#8211; is one of &#8220;off-the-record intimacy&#8221;.  Does anybody know if there was anyone from the press in the room when Jordan made his remarks? I don&#8217;t think so, otherwise this would have been reported somewhere besides through the blogs (and I don&#8217;t count Jordan himself as a member of the press, since &#8211; I am pretty sure &#8211; he was commenting in his role as a featured session speaker, and not as a journalist covering the discussion).  So he may have been taken completely by surprise by the fact that a staff member of the World Economic Forum themselves was blogging the discussion.  Hence the  desperate backpedalling.</p>
<p>In that case, Jordan is like the Dixie Chicks &#8211; Americans who start spewing anti-US or at least anti-Bush venom once they&#8217;re abroad.  They apparently haven&#8217;t figured out that what they say outside the US can still be picked up by bloggers, directly or indirectly, and zapped back to the good old US of A instantaneously.  Then comes the whole &#8220;I was misunderstood&#8221; shtick.  Pathetic.  Jordan should apologize to the Armed Forces or be sacked.  But we all know he won&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyster</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36733</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36733</guid>
		<description>Ballard, I said the same thing at my place.  Who&#039;s to say this isn&#039;t another Rather episode of, &quot;Well, they didn&#039;t &quot;deliberately&quot; target the journalists, nut we need to think about the fact that they may have WANTED to.&quot;  Personally, I would have been hard pressed not to at least beat the hell out of some of them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballard, I said the same thing at my place.  Who&#8217;s to say this isn&#8217;t another Rather episode of, &#8220;Well, they didn&#8217;t &#8220;deliberately&#8221; target the journalists, nut we need to think about the fact that they may have WANTED to.&#8221;  Personally, I would have been hard pressed not to at least beat the hell out of some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duke</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36732</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 05:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36732</guid>
		<description>Un PC response to 63 journalists being killed?  Who gives a shit?  Goes with the territory.  None of these elite pieces of crap cares when 63 janitors are murdered, or 63 cab drivers, or ten thousand shitty Kurds are gassed, so why should I give a rats ass about them?  Besides, 63 of those assholes killed?  I don&#039;t believe the number for a second.  And the army now has to be careful when going after terrorists so as not to hurt the undercover Muslim sympathizers?  Give me a break.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Un PC response to 63 journalists being killed?  Who gives a shit?  Goes with the territory.  None of these elite pieces of crap cares when 63 janitors are murdered, or 63 cab drivers, or ten thousand shitty Kurds are gassed, so why should I give a rats ass about them?  Besides, 63 of those assholes killed?  I don&#8217;t believe the number for a second.  And the army now has to be careful when going after terrorists so as not to hurt the undercover Muslim sympathizers?  Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36731</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36731</guid>
		<description>I emailed Mr. Jordan last night asking for his explanation. No bounce, but so far, no response, either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed Mr. Jordan last night asking for his explanation. No bounce, but so far, no response, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore ( Useful Fools )</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36730</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore ( Useful Fools )</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36730</guid>
		<description>We need a new name for CNN that match it&#039;s initials.



I used to call it the COMMUNIST News Network



Today, I get CORRUPT News Network

and CYNICAL News Network

and CONSCIENCE-FREE News Hetwork



And once again, they are no doubt doing exactly the same thing in Palestinian territories. A number of news outfits have done that. Furthermore, they are still doing it with Cuba, which Ted Turner seems to imagine is a peoples&#039; paradise (it is for sex tourists from Europe and Canada).



So need new names. &quot;News&quot; doesn&#039;t seem right either.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need a new name for CNN that match it&#8217;s initials.</p>
<p>I used to call it the COMMUNIST News Network</p>
<p>Today, I get CORRUPT News Network</p>
<p>and CYNICAL News Network</p>
<p>and CONSCIENCE-FREE News Hetwork</p>
<p>And once again, they are no doubt doing exactly the same thing in Palestinian territories. A number of news outfits have done that. Furthermore, they are still doing it with Cuba, which Ted Turner seems to imagine is a peoples&#8217; paradise (it is for sex tourists from Europe and Canada).</p>
<p>So need new names. &#8220;News&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem right either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy P</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36729</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36729</guid>
		<description>Charles also had this:



And please note: the problem goes much deeper than Eason Jordan. At the same News Xchange conference in Portugal, another CNN executive, Chris Cramer, told an audience that journalists were being ìdeliberately targeted for seeking out the truth.î




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles also had this:</p>
<p>And please note: the problem goes much deeper than Eason Jordan. At the same News Xchange conference in Portugal, another CNN executive, Chris Cramer, told an audience that journalists were being ìdeliberately targeted for seeking out the truth.î</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DB</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36728</link>
		<dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36728</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there video tape of this incident?   Roll the tape.  Enough with the Rashomon already.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there video tape of this incident?   Roll the tape.  Enough with the Rashomon already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dishman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36727</link>
		<dc:creator>Dishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 01:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36727</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;CNN has a lot of suffering and death on its own bloody hands in this respect.&lt;/em&gt;

... and specifically Eason Jordan.



Maybe this is part of a defense mechanism against his own fears of &#039;karma&#039; catching up with him.  Perhaps the same process can explain Ted Turner.



That is to say, he is lying himself.  Occaisionally the lie is verbalized in public.  Mostly it&#039;s just to keep &quot;the drumming monkey&quot; from pounding his psyche into pulp.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>CNN has a lot of suffering and death on its own bloody hands in this respect.</em></p>
<p>&#8230; and specifically Eason Jordan.</p>
<p>Maybe this is part of a defense mechanism against his own fears of &#8216;karma&#8217; catching up with him.  Perhaps the same process can explain Ted Turner.</p>
<p>That is to say, he is lying himself.  Occaisionally the lie is verbalized in public.  Mostly it&#8217;s just to keep &#8220;the drumming monkey&#8221; from pounding his psyche into pulp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Roesler</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36726</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Roesler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/02/02/official-statement-of-cnn-regarding-eason-jordan/#comment-36726</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Many blogs have taken Mr. Jordan&#039;s remarks out of context. Eason Jordan does not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Many blogs have taken Mr. Jordan&#8217;s remarks out of context. Eason Jordan does not believe the U.S. military is trying to kill journalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

