<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/21/old-terminology-the-four-reclaims/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:35:50 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Old Terminology - The Four Reclaims</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I agree with most of the points in my friend John Powers&amp;#8217; new LAWeekly article: A Vision of Our Own/Four ideas for the left to redefine itself.  Why shouldn&amp;#8217;t I? I&amp;#8217;ve been accusing what we still call the &amp;#8220;left&amp;#8221; of being &amp;#8220;reactionary&amp;#8221; for some time now. John writes:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:35:59 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2005/01/21/old-terminology-the-four-reclaims-n206471</link></item></channel></rss>