<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lord of the Fatuous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peg C.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34582</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34582</guid>
		<description>Ben beat me to it, but I want to ditto his comment about having to sit and listen to hours and hours of self-important, pontificating blowhards with more hair than brains (certainly in the case of Kerry and Boxer) being excellent preparation for the job facing Condi. She is full of grace, AND fire and brilliance. I hope the world was watching. They will misunderestimate her at their peril.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben beat me to it, but I want to ditto his comment about having to sit and listen to hours and hours of self-important, pontificating blowhards with more hair than brains (certainly in the case of Kerry and Boxer) being excellent preparation for the job facing Condi. She is full of grace, AND fire and brilliance. I hope the world was watching. They will misunderestimate her at their peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34581</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34581</guid>
		<description>I am related to people like this and for many of them the truth is they just hate the war.



They know soldiers who have been hurt or killed and even though our soldiers may believe in the mission the Middle East is not a place most of them want to be. I pointed out to my brother that they are soldiers in a voluntary military and they have a job. He said he did not think most of them minded doing their duty, but their duty did not include rock throwing teenagers and irate civilians. And there is no doubt that films like F911 and anti war people like Dean are hard on troop morale. War is not any fun and it is worse if a substantial part of the population is telling you that you are either a baby killer or are being played for a sucker. Take your pick.





That is why I blame people like Michael Moore and Barabara Boxer, they are using the natural aversion most people feel for war for self serving reasons and they are dishonest about their message.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am related to people like this and for many of them the truth is they just hate the war.</p>
<p>They know soldiers who have been hurt or killed and even though our soldiers may believe in the mission the Middle East is not a place most of them want to be. I pointed out to my brother that they are soldiers in a voluntary military and they have a job. He said he did not think most of them minded doing their duty, but their duty did not include rock throwing teenagers and irate civilians. And there is no doubt that films like F911 and anti war people like Dean are hard on troop morale. War is not any fun and it is worse if a substantial part of the population is telling you that you are either a baby killer or are being played for a sucker. Take your pick.</p>
<p>That is why I blame people like Michael Moore and Barabara Boxer, they are using the natural aversion most people feel for war for self serving reasons and they are dishonest about their message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34580</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34580</guid>
		<description>Ben,



Good point!  Condi will, after all, have to deal with the likes of Chirac and Schroeder.



Paul,



To paraphrase Dirty Harry, &quot;A Moonbat&#039;s gotta know his limitations!&quot; and thinking things through is apparently beyond the capablilities of most of today&#039;s crop of Dems.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Good point!  Condi will, after all, have to deal with the likes of Chirac and Schroeder.</p>
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>To paraphrase Dirty Harry, &#8220;A Moonbat&#8217;s gotta know his limitations!&#8221; and thinking things through is apparently beyond the capablilities of most of today&#8217;s crop of Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34579</guid>
		<description>Maybe the decision to make Condi sit for hours on end listening to inane drivel from the likes of Barbara Boxer is intended to be a dry run for negotiating with the ChiComs.  Frankly, I don&#039;t know how anyone could stand the job of SecState - I admire Condi for agreeing to take it.  Diplomats have a reputation for talking for hours on end without EVER getting to the point.  After 10 minutes, I would be ready to jump off a bridge.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the decision to make Condi sit for hours on end listening to inane drivel from the likes of Barbara Boxer is intended to be a dry run for negotiating with the ChiComs.  Frankly, I don&#8217;t know how anyone could stand the job of SecState &#8211; I admire Condi for agreeing to take it.  Diplomats have a reputation for talking for hours on end without EVER getting to the point.  After 10 minutes, I would be ready to jump off a bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34578</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34578</guid>
		<description>Roger:



The StevieJ&#039;s and the Boxers of the world just don&#039;t understand the internet age. They cull out a press secretaries comment and jump up and down on their soapbox and yell&quot;smoking gun, smoking gun&quot;. They are too dense to realize that all the speech&#039;s that the administration made that included non-WMD arguments are a google or hyper link away and the original texts that proove them to be wrong are available for everyone. Boxer gets her 10 second soundbite where she refers to the resolution the congress voted on as being about only WMD and is either too dense or uniformed to know that the resolution is available to anyone and the text of it shows her to be either a moron or a fraud. The days of being able to say anything on TV and not have it fact checked in seconds are over.Ask Dan Rather. The dems will continue to bleat on about WMD&#039;s for the next 4 years and they don&#039;t realize that the majority of the country has moved on and is concerned about other things. Just as they held onto Florida 2000 and thought that was going to get them back into the White House they will ride the WMD tangent to another 2nd place finish in 2008.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger:</p>
<p>The StevieJ&#8217;s and the Boxers of the world just don&#8217;t understand the internet age. They cull out a press secretaries comment and jump up and down on their soapbox and yell&#8221;smoking gun, smoking gun&#8221;. They are too dense to realize that all the speech&#8217;s that the administration made that included non-WMD arguments are a google or hyper link away and the original texts that proove them to be wrong are available for everyone. Boxer gets her 10 second soundbite where she refers to the resolution the congress voted on as being about only WMD and is either too dense or uniformed to know that the resolution is available to anyone and the text of it shows her to be either a moron or a fraud. The days of being able to say anything on TV and not have it fact checked in seconds are over.Ask Dan Rather. The dems will continue to bleat on about WMD&#8217;s for the next 4 years and they don&#8217;t realize that the majority of the country has moved on and is concerned about other things. Just as they held onto Florida 2000 and thought that was going to get them back into the White House they will ride the WMD tangent to another 2nd place finish in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34577</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34577</guid>
		<description>This whole no WMD &quot;gotcha&quot; business really infuriates me. On a PRACTICAL NATIONAL SECURITY LEVEL who is stupid enough to believe that, even if Saddam didn&#039;t have stockpiles of WMDs, after the US military slunk back home and sanctions were lifted (which is what the Donks and leftys the world over were pushing for) he wouldn&#039;t have resumed his WMD programs with total impunity?



More importantly pulling that scumbag out of the spider hole led to the voluntary dismantling of Libya&#039;s surprisingly advanced nuclear program AND the discovery of the A.Q. Khan nuclear &quot;supermarket&quot;.



So taking out Saddam needs to be seen in a broader context than &quot;no WMDs were found, therefore OIF was a mistake&quot;. It needs to be juxtaposed against the real world consequences of leaving him in power and the resulting chain of events that would have left three extremely dangerous forces in the ME unchecked.



The fact that the left refuses to face this boneheadedly obvious conclusion for purely partisan reasons, despite the danger to American lives (including their own as well as their families) reaffirms the desperate need to keep them as far away from the levers of power as possible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole no WMD &#8220;gotcha&#8221; business really infuriates me. On a PRACTICAL NATIONAL SECURITY LEVEL who is stupid enough to believe that, even if Saddam didn&#8217;t have stockpiles of WMDs, after the US military slunk back home and sanctions were lifted (which is what the Donks and leftys the world over were pushing for) he wouldn&#8217;t have resumed his WMD programs with total impunity?</p>
<p>More importantly pulling that scumbag out of the spider hole led to the voluntary dismantling of Libya&#8217;s surprisingly advanced nuclear program AND the discovery of the A.Q. Khan nuclear &#8220;supermarket&#8221;.</p>
<p>So taking out Saddam needs to be seen in a broader context than &#8220;no WMDs were found, therefore OIF was a mistake&#8221;. It needs to be juxtaposed against the real world consequences of leaving him in power and the resulting chain of events that would have left three extremely dangerous forces in the ME unchecked.</p>
<p>The fact that the left refuses to face this boneheadedly obvious conclusion for purely partisan reasons, despite the danger to American lives (including their own as well as their families) reaffirms the desperate need to keep them as far away from the levers of power as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34576</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34576</guid>
		<description>Yeah, so I just found out . . . thanks for the correction.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, so I just found out . . . thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34575</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34575</guid>
		<description>Probably picking a nit here, Lola, but what happened was that the Senate Foriegn Relations Committee recommended confirmation.  Confirmation itself is still technically subject to a full Senate vote, IIRC.  Boxer and Kerry were, of course, the two nay votes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably picking a nit here, Lola, but what happened was that the Senate Foriegn Relations Committee recommended confirmation.  Confirmation itself is still technically subject to a full Senate vote, IIRC.  Boxer and Kerry were, of course, the two nay votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34574</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34574</guid>
		<description>Well . . . now she&#039;s confirmed.  Only two votes against her.  Guess who were these naysayers?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well . . . now she&#8217;s confirmed.  Only two votes against her.  Guess who were these naysayers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34573</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/18/lord-of-the-fatuous/#comment-34573</guid>
		<description>erp,



Dr. Rice is not a woman to be trifled with.  The likes of Babs Boxer calling her a liar surely did not sit well with her.



I didn&#039;t have the good fortune of seeing any of yesterday&#039;s fiasco while in the company of my wife and daughters, but I have had that pleasure in the past and just chuckled while hearing comments like, &quot;Damn, she&#039;s GOOD!&quot;, &quot;Whoever that idiot is he really ought to shut up &#039;cause she&#039;s kicking his ass!&quot;, and &quot;Gee, it all makes sense when she explains it.&quot;



The feminist left must hate her with a passion.  Go Condi!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erp,</p>
<p>Dr. Rice is not a woman to be trifled with.  The likes of Babs Boxer calling her a liar surely did not sit well with her.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have the good fortune of seeing any of yesterday&#8217;s fiasco while in the company of my wife and daughters, but I have had that pleasure in the past and just chuckled while hearing comments like, &#8220;Damn, she&#8217;s GOOD!&#8221;, &#8220;Whoever that idiot is he really ought to shut up &#8217;cause she&#8217;s kicking his ass!&#8221;, and &#8220;Gee, it all makes sense when she explains it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The feminist left must hate her with a passion.  Go Condi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

