<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Line of Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Irons</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Irons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33944</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Katherine&lt;/b&gt;



Sorry I keep missing you; I seem to read Roger&#039;s page at the wrong times!



;-(



Jamie Irons
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Katherine</b></p>
<p>Sorry I keep missing you; I seem to read Roger&#8217;s page at the wrong times!</p>
<p>;-(</p>
<p>Jamie Irons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyster</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33943</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33943</guid>
		<description>I had a fight with my son over that tub-o-lard too.  (He&#039;s not a leftie.  He&#039;s hard to peg.  He hates everything.)  His argument was that it raised some important issues, even if it&#039;s all lies.  I now call him Dan Rather.  He hates that now too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a fight with my son over that tub-o-lard too.  (He&#8217;s not a leftie.  He&#8217;s hard to peg.  He hates everything.)  His argument was that it raised some important issues, even if it&#8217;s all lies.  I now call him Dan Rather.  He hates that now too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33942</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33942</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the way Orson Welles told it:



&quot;Now I&#039;m going to tell you about a scorpion. This scorpion wanted to cross a river, so he asked the frog to carry him. No, said the frog, no think you; if I let you on my back you may sting me, and the sting of a scorpion is death. Now where - asked the scorpion - is the logic in that? For scorpions will try to be logical. If I sting you you will die, and I will drown. The frog was convinced and allowed the scorpion on his back, but just in the middle of the river he felt a terrible pain and realized that after all, the scorpion had stung him. Logic, cried the dying frog as he started under bearing the scorpion with him, there is no logic in this! I know, said the scorpion, but I can&#039;t help it -- it is my character.&quot;



And then he proposed a toast to character.



From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048393/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mr. Arkadin&lt;/a&gt;, his most underrated movie. If Fellini had done a film noir, it would have been Mr. Arkadin.



(This post contains 100% non-political material.)




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the way Orson Welles told it:</p>
<p>&#8220;Now I&#8217;m going to tell you about a scorpion. This scorpion wanted to cross a river, so he asked the frog to carry him. No, said the frog, no think you; if I let you on my back you may sting me, and the sting of a scorpion is death. Now where &#8211; asked the scorpion &#8211; is the logic in that? For scorpions will try to be logical. If I sting you you will die, and I will drown. The frog was convinced and allowed the scorpion on his back, but just in the middle of the river he felt a terrible pain and realized that after all, the scorpion had stung him. Logic, cried the dying frog as he started under bearing the scorpion with him, there is no logic in this! I know, said the scorpion, but I can&#8217;t help it &#8212; it is my character.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then he proposed a toast to character.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048393/" rel="nofollow">Mr. Arkadin</a>, his most underrated movie. If Fellini had done a film noir, it would have been Mr. Arkadin.</p>
<p>(This post contains 100% non-political material.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33941</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33941</guid>
		<description>Jamie,



Isnít it good that I didnít have to have that crawl space lined with lead?



BTW, my party offer still stands, but nobody wants to comeÖ(sniff!).  We would have it OUTSIDE the crawl space, I promiseÖ



Terrye,



Re Pelosi:  Quick, who said the following?



&quot;Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.&quot;



A) BushHitler in his mad rush to war

B) The saintly Nancy, champion of the oppressed.



The answer, as you all guessed is B) but it was on Dec. 16, 1998 when the only Party deserving power was holding the White House.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie,</p>
<p>Isnít it good that I didnít have to have that crawl space lined with lead?</p>
<p>BTW, my party offer still stands, but nobody wants to comeÖ(sniff!).  We would have it OUTSIDE the crawl space, I promiseÖ</p>
<p>Terrye,</p>
<p>Re Pelosi:  Quick, who said the following?</p>
<p>&#8220;Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.&#8221;</p>
<p>A) BushHitler in his mad rush to war</p>
<p>B) The saintly Nancy, champion of the oppressed.</p>
<p>The answer, as you all guessed is B) but it was on Dec. 16, 1998 when the only Party deserving power was holding the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33940</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33940</guid>
		<description>I mean Pelosi, she of the face lift.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean Pelosi, she of the face lift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33939</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33939</guid>
		<description>Well you know guys I did a bang up job of avoiding the topic for some time but my brother finally pinned me down and to tell you the truth that made me as mad as the topic of conversation itself.



So I thought well fine just because both our parents are dead and we have no other siblings is no reason not to get in a big ass fight over that fat Benedict Arnold.





And I think the Democrats are underestimating how annoying they are. If I have to hear one more snarky little comment about how they are going to take that gloves off I will spit up...I mean what is left? Burning crosses on the White House lawn or what?



But I mean it, guys like Moore are good at editing mockumentaries and creating a false impression but if they think they can prove Bush went to war for a nonexistant pipeline or a war time contract for Halliburton or because Bush is related to the Saudi Royal family then they should sic Peolosi on it rather than making movies.



idiots.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you know guys I did a bang up job of avoiding the topic for some time but my brother finally pinned me down and to tell you the truth that made me as mad as the topic of conversation itself.</p>
<p>So I thought well fine just because both our parents are dead and we have no other siblings is no reason not to get in a big ass fight over that fat Benedict Arnold.</p>
<p>And I think the Democrats are underestimating how annoying they are. If I have to hear one more snarky little comment about how they are going to take that gloves off I will spit up&#8230;I mean what is left? Burning crosses on the White House lawn or what?</p>
<p>But I mean it, guys like Moore are good at editing mockumentaries and creating a false impression but if they think they can prove Bush went to war for a nonexistant pipeline or a war time contract for Halliburton or because Bush is related to the Saudi Royal family then they should sic Peolosi on it rather than making movies.</p>
<p>idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bostonian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33938</link>
		<dc:creator>Bostonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33938</guid>
		<description>John Moore:

Yes, I noticed that itchy trigger finger of the Democrats. I take it as 90% bluff, though. When your lawsuit is ready before anything even happened, it might just be hot air.



And I did indeed (and still do) think that the SBVT were confident *because* they had truth on their side.



John O&#039;Neil taught me to have a great deal of respect for lawyers, respect I had not had before. Several legal blogs added to that, of course.



I&#039;ve been wondering what&#039;s happening with the SBVT. John Kerry got away with far, far too much. Not just endangering the troops in that war, not just slandering the reputations of so many innocent men--he helped create the War about War that we&#039;re still having.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Moore:</p>
<p>Yes, I noticed that itchy trigger finger of the Democrats. I take it as 90% bluff, though. When your lawsuit is ready before anything even happened, it might just be hot air.</p>
<p>And I did indeed (and still do) think that the SBVT were confident *because* they had truth on their side.</p>
<p>John O&#8217;Neil taught me to have a great deal of respect for lawyers, respect I had not had before. Several legal blogs added to that, of course.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering what&#8217;s happening with the SBVT. John Kerry got away with far, far too much. Not just endangering the troops in that war, not just slandering the reputations of so many innocent men&#8211;he helped create the War about War that we&#8217;re still having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore ( Useful Fools )</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33937</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore ( Useful Fools )</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33937</guid>
		<description>Terrye,

The version I always heard had a camel instead of a frog, and the scorpion&#039;s final response was &quot;Because this is the middle east, stupid!&quot;



Bostonian,



The Democrats emitted or threatened to emit lawsuits at a tremendous rate. They aimed them at the stations that were to broadcast the commericals, and at John O&#039;Neil, and who knows who else. My understnding as of yesterday was that they were still going after O&#039;Neil.



Truth is the best defense against slander, but when billionaires are willing to throw huge numbers of lawyers from big law firms, in multiple suits, against you, the cost to defend yourself - such as the discovery efforts - can be enormous. I have information that causes me to believe that they did and are doing this to John O&#039;Neil (the topic gives a hint as to why I worded this posting in a certain unusal way).



Today&#039;s Democrats and their supporters are, by their actions, making it clear that they have no interest in the concept of free speech. That they would continue this arfter the election is especially galling.



They may be doing this partly because they fear that if they don&#039;t win the suit, Kerry will be unable to run for President in 2008, and likely to lose the Senatorial re-election. If they don&#039;t win such a suit, the opponents can claim that the charges were held valid in court (which would not necessarily be true, btw), a powerful political point.I suspect some is revenge, especially since I believe Kerry&#039;s campaign manager said that not responding to the SBVT was the biggest mistake, implying that the SBVT pushed the election past the tipping point to Bush. Also, there will be one or more campaignsto unseat Kerry on various grounds (treason, 14th Amendment, felonious behavior in the peace movement, whatever).



I am not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that to get a slander judgement against a publicly known figure, you have to prove both that the facts were untruthful and that the slander was a result of actual malice (which means among other things, I believe, that you have to prove that the slanderer knew that the facts were false), not just carelessness. I would suggest that Bush has a good case against certain people at CBS.



Rick



&quot;accidental partial lobotomy during circumcision&quot;



&lt;b&gt;ROFL&lt;/b&gt; That is good at several levels!






</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrye,</p>
<p>The version I always heard had a camel instead of a frog, and the scorpion&#8217;s final response was &#8220;Because this is the middle east, stupid!&#8221;</p>
<p>Bostonian,</p>
<p>The Democrats emitted or threatened to emit lawsuits at a tremendous rate. They aimed them at the stations that were to broadcast the commericals, and at John O&#8217;Neil, and who knows who else. My understnding as of yesterday was that they were still going after O&#8217;Neil.</p>
<p>Truth is the best defense against slander, but when billionaires are willing to throw huge numbers of lawyers from big law firms, in multiple suits, against you, the cost to defend yourself &#8211; such as the discovery efforts &#8211; can be enormous. I have information that causes me to believe that they did and are doing this to John O&#8217;Neil (the topic gives a hint as to why I worded this posting in a certain unusal way).</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s Democrats and their supporters are, by their actions, making it clear that they have no interest in the concept of free speech. That they would continue this arfter the election is especially galling.</p>
<p>They may be doing this partly because they fear that if they don&#8217;t win the suit, Kerry will be unable to run for President in 2008, and likely to lose the Senatorial re-election. If they don&#8217;t win such a suit, the opponents can claim that the charges were held valid in court (which would not necessarily be true, btw), a powerful political point.I suspect some is revenge, especially since I believe Kerry&#8217;s campaign manager said that not responding to the SBVT was the biggest mistake, implying that the SBVT pushed the election past the tipping point to Bush. Also, there will be one or more campaignsto unseat Kerry on various grounds (treason, 14th Amendment, felonious behavior in the peace movement, whatever).</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that to get a slander judgement against a publicly known figure, you have to prove both that the facts were untruthful and that the slander was a result of actual malice (which means among other things, I believe, that you have to prove that the slanderer knew that the facts were false), not just carelessness. I would suggest that Bush has a good case against certain people at CBS.</p>
<p>Rick</p>
<p>&#8220;accidental partial lobotomy during circumcision&#8221;</p>
<p><b>ROFL</b> That is good at several levels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Evans</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33936</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33936</guid>
		<description>Terrye- I lost longtime friends over M.Moore and the general lunacy that has infected the democratic party.  The entire basis for his argument was fundamentally flawed- I cannot, as a rationale person, accept that the entire premise for the Iraq war was so that George W. could get (wait for it) RICHER. But Moore did and people bought it.



I think basing an entire anti-war platform on the ridiculous notion that George Bush is as bad as Hitler dooms you to failure long term.  Nobody believes Bush is gassing Jews and burning books, do they ?   And yet, I swear to God, some people I have known for a long time, rationale educated people tell me &quot;It was all about oil&quot;.  And then they stop, and look at me, like they&#039;re saying &quot;Ccome have a sip of my koolaid.&quot;



Also, does anyone else find it incredible that the Human Rights Commission ranked Abu Ghiraib (panties) right up there with Darfur (mass murder of a people)?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrye- I lost longtime friends over M.Moore and the general lunacy that has infected the democratic party.  The entire basis for his argument was fundamentally flawed- I cannot, as a rationale person, accept that the entire premise for the Iraq war was so that George W. could get (wait for it) RICHER. But Moore did and people bought it.</p>
<p>I think basing an entire anti-war platform on the ridiculous notion that George Bush is as bad as Hitler dooms you to failure long term.  Nobody believes Bush is gassing Jews and burning books, do they ?   And yet, I swear to God, some people I have known for a long time, rationale educated people tell me &#8220;It was all about oil&#8221;.  And then they stop, and look at me, like they&#8217;re saying &#8220;Ccome have a sip of my koolaid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, does anyone else find it incredible that the Human Rights Commission ranked Abu Ghiraib (panties) right up there with Darfur (mass murder of a people)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Irons</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Irons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2005/01/13/in-the-line-of-fire/#comment-33935</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Rick Ballard&lt;/b&gt;



I&#039;ve always called you our &quot;&lt;b&gt;resident psephologist&lt;/b&gt;,&quot; but I am dismayed to hear that you are suffering from &quot;&lt;b&gt;advanced psepholesis&lt;/b&gt;.&quot;



Is there a website for that? I feel like I ought to make a contribution.



;-)



Jamie Irons
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Rick Ballard</b></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always called you our &#8220;<b>resident psephologist</b>,&#8221; but I am dismayed to hear that you are suffering from &#8220;<b>advanced psepholesis</b>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is there a website for that? I feel like I ought to make a contribution.</p>
<p> <img src='http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jamie Irons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

