<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/12/22/the-new-litmus-test/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:15:36 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The New Litmus Test</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Mark Follman, writing for Salon (sorry, interminable commercial necessary to read what should be free), criticizes my response to some AP photographs of a killing in Baghdad the other day.  He makes some good points (and others not so good), but what interests me is that he immediately lumps me as a &amp;#8220;conservative blogger,&amp;#8221; although I favor gay marriage, a woman&amp;#8217;s right to choose, etc.  It seems that your attitude toward the war has become a new litmus test for ideology. No matter that some of us favor the war in part because we support the aforementioned positions. Follman and many of the more &amp;#8220;traditionalist&amp;#8221; left have been blinded by a monolithic approach to political thinking.  Too bad for them. History is already passing them by.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 06:55:22 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2004/12/22/the-new-litmus-test-n206099</link></item></channel></rss>