<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/11/18/two-chuck-berrys-but-no-little-richard/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:07:08 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Two Chuck Berry's, but no Little Richard?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Rolling Stone Magazine has released its top 500 songs of all time. Not only are there no Schubert lieder in the top 20, there&amp;#8217;s no Little Richard!  Outrageous! Anway, here they are from one to twenty: [How come &amp;#8220;Maybellene&amp;#8221; got in ahead of &amp;#8220;Memphis&amp;#8221;?-ed. Oh, shut up!]]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:36:17 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Roger L. Simon]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/roger-l-simon/2004/11/18/two-chuck-berrys-but-no-little-richard-n205790</link></item></channel></rss>