<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live Blogging the Debate&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaDr</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18481</link>
		<dc:creator>MaDr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18481</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t stand Kerry, but didn&#039;t feel I had too much trouble remaining objective.  I put myself into the shoes of who I think the undecideds or shiftables are.  In general I think they haven&#039;t paid close attention yet, so they wouldn&#039;t know what Kerry&#039;s positions are or when he&#039;s flip-flopped before (no one&#039;s going to necessary believe his opponent when he claims he flip-flops).  Based on Kerry&#039;s breadth and depth of knowledge (how would they know most were distortions) he won on substance.  Bush frowned off-camera, paused too long, repeated the same message too many times (I even got tired of it), and was slouching at the lecturn.  Kerry won on style.



Kerry will gain 2-3 points over next two days.  By the end of the third debate, they&#039;ll be neck and neck (in the polls).  Barring a catastrophe, Bush will win (Kerry&#039;s internals are just too awful).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stand Kerry, but didn&#8217;t feel I had too much trouble remaining objective.  I put myself into the shoes of who I think the undecideds or shiftables are.  In general I think they haven&#8217;t paid close attention yet, so they wouldn&#8217;t know what Kerry&#8217;s positions are or when he&#8217;s flip-flopped before (no one&#8217;s going to necessary believe his opponent when he claims he flip-flops).  Based on Kerry&#8217;s breadth and depth of knowledge (how would they know most were distortions) he won on substance.  Bush frowned off-camera, paused too long, repeated the same message too many times (I even got tired of it), and was slouching at the lecturn.  Kerry won on style.</p>
<p>Kerry will gain 2-3 points over next two days.  By the end of the third debate, they&#8217;ll be neck and neck (in the polls).  Barring a catastrophe, Bush will win (Kerry&#8217;s internals are just too awful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18480</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18480</guid>
		<description>I caught abut ten seconds of Kerry on the air and couldn&#039;t stand it any more.



You and the other live bloggers are doing a great service to those with no stomach for Kerry.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught abut ten seconds of Kerry on the air and couldn&#8217;t stand it any more.</p>
<p>You and the other live bloggers are doing a great service to those with no stomach for Kerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceCold</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18479</link>
		<dc:creator>IceCold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/30/live-blogging-the-debate/#comment-18479</guid>
		<description>Well, at least share the brand of the malbec.  I haven&#039;t had any malbec from central California, though I recently had some up in Sonoma.  Like most I usually rely on good cheap Argentine malbec for that variety.  And speaking of (relatively) obscure reds, Virginia&#039;s starting to do pretty good 100% cabernet franc bottlings.  Time was when only a handful of Dry Creek producers did some of those.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least share the brand of the malbec.  I haven&#8217;t had any malbec from central California, though I recently had some up in Sonoma.  Like most I usually rely on good cheap Argentine malbec for that variety.  And speaking of (relatively) obscure reds, Virginia&#8217;s starting to do pretty good 100% cabernet franc bottlings.  Time was when only a handful of Dry Creek producers did some of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

