<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Business War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehudit</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16318</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehudit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16318</guid>
		<description>&quot;WaPo via Drudge: CBS will admit error tomorrow night.&quot;



So maybe the rumor I heard that Dan will announce his resignation tomorrow, might be true . . .

but if so, why did they send him to Dallas?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WaPo via Drudge: CBS will admit error tomorrow night.&#8221;</p>
<p>So maybe the rumor I heard that Dan will announce his resignation tomorrow, might be true . . .</p>
<p>but if so, why did they send him to Dallas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie (Colorado)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16317</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie (Colorado)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16317</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34151-2004Sep19?language=printer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WaPo via Drudge: CBS will admit error tomorrow night.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34151-2004Sep19?language=printer" rel="nofollow">WaPo via Drudge: CBS will admit error tomorrow night.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syl</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16316</link>
		<dc:creator>Syl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 05:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16316</guid>
		<description>Rather believes Burkett.



Why does he believe Burkett?



Because Burkett echos the conventional wisdom in Rather&#039;s circle that Bush got preferential treatment and blew off his responsibilities.



Where did this conventional wisdom originate many years ago?



Burkett and Barnes.



See, it must be true, Burkett confirms it!



Friends, this is insanity.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather believes Burkett.</p>
<p>Why does he believe Burkett?</p>
<p>Because Burkett echos the conventional wisdom in Rather&#8217;s circle that Bush got preferential treatment and blew off his responsibilities.</p>
<p>Where did this conventional wisdom originate many years ago?</p>
<p>Burkett and Barnes.</p>
<p>See, it must be true, Burkett confirms it!</p>
<p>Friends, this is insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16315</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16315</guid>
		<description>Knucklehead,



Thanks for the link. I thought the report was pretty good on the whole, although I found this description of the journalist&#039;s role somewhat offensive: referee, watchdog, interpreter. That role is earned, not conferred by a job title.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knucklehead,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link. I thought the report was pretty good on the whole, although I found this description of the journalist&#8217;s role somewhat offensive: referee, watchdog, interpreter. That role is earned, not conferred by a job title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16314</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16314</guid>
		<description>Terrye:



&lt;i&gt;Well there is always the possibility that Rather will instruct Burkett to explain to the world just how horrible the Bushes were to him and what a lousy excuse for a human being George Bush really is.&lt;/i&gt;



I think you nailed it. Anyone for starting a pot? I&#039;m in for 10 internet dollars on this one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrye:</p>
<p><i>Well there is always the possibility that Rather will instruct Burkett to explain to the world just how horrible the Bushes were to him and what a lousy excuse for a human being George Bush really is.</i></p>
<p>I think you nailed it. Anyone for starting a pot? I&#8217;m in for 10 internet dollars on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16313</guid>
		<description>Knucklehead:



So, contempt for their readers is going to get them a bigger audience? They think we don&#039;t notice? These guys are nuts. Advertising pays their bills; where the audience goes, the advertising will follow, then where will they be? These guys remind me of a boor at a party, the more folks avoid them, the worse they become. Nuts, just absolutely nuts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knucklehead:</p>
<p>So, contempt for their readers is going to get them a bigger audience? They think we don&#8217;t notice? These guys are nuts. Advertising pays their bills; where the audience goes, the advertising will follow, then where will they be? These guys remind me of a boor at a party, the more folks avoid them, the worse they become. Nuts, just absolutely nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16312</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16312</guid>
		<description>Terrye ó If he does, the WaPo has another good week...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrye ó If he does, the WaPo has another good week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16311</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16311</guid>
		<description>ìThere may be another explanation, because the two possibilities I see are both suicidal for Rather.î



Itís also suicidal for the others at CBS who are not about to retire.  The interview makes no sense.  Bill Burkett has no credibility whatsoever. This long established TV network is quickly becoming a joke.  What does Rather have on CBSí top executives?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ìThere may be another explanation, because the two possibilities I see are both suicidal for Rather.î</p>
<p>Itís also suicidal for the others at CBS who are not about to retire.  The interview makes no sense.  Bill Burkett has no credibility whatsoever. This long established TV network is quickly becoming a joke.  What does Rather have on CBSí top executives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16310</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16310</guid>
		<description>Speaking of business I just watched Breaking Point on Fox. The subject was the oil for food scandal. They entitle the piece Blood Money. It was a nice review I thought, but not a lot of new information.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of business I just watched Breaking Point on Fox. The subject was the oil for food scandal. They entitle the piece Blood Money. It was a nice review I thought, but not a lot of new information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16309</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 02:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/19/a-new-business-war/#comment-16309</guid>
		<description>RogerA:



Well there is always the possibility that Rather will instruct Burkett to explain to the world just how horrible the Bushes were to him and what a lousy excuse for a human being George Bush really is.





I have not seen anything from Rather thus far that would lead me to believe he thinks he has done anything amiss. He might jsut intend to keep digging.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RogerA:</p>
<p>Well there is always the possibility that Rather will instruct Burkett to explain to the world just how horrible the Bushes were to him and what a lousy excuse for a human being George Bush really is.</p>
<p>I have not seen anything from Rather thus far that would lead me to believe he thinks he has done anything amiss. He might jsut intend to keep digging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

