<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silver Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/</link>
	<description>The blog of the mystery writer, screenwriter and CEO of Pajamas Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksamson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11683</link>
		<dc:creator>ksamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 10:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11683</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Silver has indeed been very impressive on MSNBC&#039;s coverage. Compared with the other celebrities on both sides, Silver comes off as supremely knowledgeable (at least on modern historical aspects), he speaks to points rather than vainly trying to score them with put downs or non-sequiturs (unlike Ron Reagan who does no else and therefore has been soundly thrashed by Silver in their conflicts). He hardly looks overmatched next to old hands like Andrea Mitchell or Mike Barnicle. He is of course, not quite as savvy when it comes to &quot;inside politics&quot; as they are, but on arguments of history he appears to have superior knowledge. I&#039;m guessing history is a hobby/passion of his even outside of whatever political issues he wishes to debate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



He&#039;s a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, so unlike some Hollywood actors, he won&#039;t embarass himself when he talks about foreign policy or history.



http://cultureconnect.state.gov/?p=RSBiography


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Silver has indeed been very impressive on MSNBC&#8217;s coverage. Compared with the other celebrities on both sides, Silver comes off as supremely knowledgeable (at least on modern historical aspects), he speaks to points rather than vainly trying to score them with put downs or non-sequiturs (unlike Ron Reagan who does no else and therefore has been soundly thrashed by Silver in their conflicts). He hardly looks overmatched next to old hands like Andrea Mitchell or Mike Barnicle. He is of course, not quite as savvy when it comes to &#8220;inside politics&#8221; as they are, but on arguments of history he appears to have superior knowledge. I&#8217;m guessing history is a hobby/passion of his even outside of whatever political issues he wishes to debate.</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, so unlike some Hollywood actors, he won&#8217;t embarass himself when he talks about foreign policy or history.</p>
<p><a href="http://cultureconnect.state.gov/?p=RSBiography" rel="nofollow">http://cultureconnect.state.gov/?p=RSBiography</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin P</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11682</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 05:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11682</guid>
		<description>Roger:



The best thing about Mr. Silver is that he knows what he is talking about. I have heard him on several talk shows and his description of how the democratic party has abandoned it&#039;s traditional stance against dictatorships and has adopted the pacifist exclusion of force against even the most brutal regimes. During the sixties, seventies and eighties the left railed against the US governments support of dictatorships during the cold war. At least the right had the excuse of saying that support was in the cause of fighting a greater evil,even though it was taken too far in some cases. We never heard the end of their wailing abour Pinochet, the Shah, the military dictatorships of Greece and the Marcos. But when it comes to Iraq they suddenlly adopt the cynical real politic policy that would have left Saddam and his sons in control.When Bush 43 began his term he was going to continue the 60 year old policy of leaving the governments of the ME in place for the sake of stability. But after 9-11 he knew that policy was bankrupt, for security and moral reasons. He ended the Taliban and the Saddam regimes and the left now complains about hiow he did it. If Kerry was in control they would still be there. Of course he would stand up at the UN and state what terrible regimes they were, he might even threaten sanctions, but at far as removing them he would have done nothing. Saddam and his sons would still be funding suicide bombers in Palestine, still be a safe haven for any terrorist who needed sanctuary. The Taliban would still be forcing the women of that country back  into the dark ages .I have no doubt that Mr. Silver shares our host&#039;s disdain for the social ideas of the current administration but as far as the security of this country and the world he has been able to lift the blinders of party loyalty and come to a rational conclusion about who should lead this country in the struggle against Islamo-Fascism. Bravo Mr. Silver!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger:</p>
<p>The best thing about Mr. Silver is that he knows what he is talking about. I have heard him on several talk shows and his description of how the democratic party has abandoned it&#8217;s traditional stance against dictatorships and has adopted the pacifist exclusion of force against even the most brutal regimes. During the sixties, seventies and eighties the left railed against the US governments support of dictatorships during the cold war. At least the right had the excuse of saying that support was in the cause of fighting a greater evil,even though it was taken too far in some cases. We never heard the end of their wailing abour Pinochet, the Shah, the military dictatorships of Greece and the Marcos. But when it comes to Iraq they suddenlly adopt the cynical real politic policy that would have left Saddam and his sons in control.When Bush 43 began his term he was going to continue the 60 year old policy of leaving the governments of the ME in place for the sake of stability. But after 9-11 he knew that policy was bankrupt, for security and moral reasons. He ended the Taliban and the Saddam regimes and the left now complains about hiow he did it. If Kerry was in control they would still be there. Of course he would stand up at the UN and state what terrible regimes they were, he might even threaten sanctions, but at far as removing them he would have done nothing. Saddam and his sons would still be funding suicide bombers in Palestine, still be a safe haven for any terrorist who needed sanctuary. The Taliban would still be forcing the women of that country back  into the dark ages .I have no doubt that Mr. Silver shares our host&#8217;s disdain for the social ideas of the current administration but as far as the security of this country and the world he has been able to lift the blinders of party loyalty and come to a rational conclusion about who should lead this country in the struggle against Islamo-Fascism. Bravo Mr. Silver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard mcenroe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11681</link>
		<dc:creator>richard mcenroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11681</guid>
		<description>Just got this off the Hollywood Reporter home page...



&quot;Actress and activist Whoopi Goldberg filed suit against novelist and screenwriter Roger L. Simon in Beverly Hills Civil court today.



&quot;According to fading star of Hollywood Squares, she was struck in the head by a heavy medallion flung into her back yard this afternoon.



&quot;Goldberg described the star-shaped medal as coming over the wall her property shares with &quot;that fascist Silver&quot; and &quot;I know damn well where he got it...&quot;  &quot;



BTW, posted a link to a preview of my two new protest signs down on the &quot;Off Night&quot; thread... &gt;:D
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got this off the Hollywood Reporter home page&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Actress and activist Whoopi Goldberg filed suit against novelist and screenwriter Roger L. Simon in Beverly Hills Civil court today.</p>
<p>&#8220;According to fading star of Hollywood Squares, she was struck in the head by a heavy medallion flung into her back yard this afternoon.</p>
<p>&#8220;Goldberg described the star-shaped medal as coming over the wall her property shares with &#8220;that fascist Silver&#8221; and &#8220;I know damn well where he got it&#8230;&#8221;  &#8221;</p>
<p>BTW, posted a link to a preview of my two new protest signs down on the &#8220;Off Night&#8221; thread&#8230; &gt;:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knucklehead</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11680</link>
		<dc:creator>Knucklehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11680</guid>
		<description>OT, but since the NYT is mentioned...  Those of you who have online accounts (I refuse to go through the NYT account nonsense again, so I can&#039;t and won&#039;t link) with the NYT or access for the dead tree version are invited to go look in the P Section, page P5, and see &lt;i&gt;Giuliani Described Remark to Kerik Years Ago&lt;/i&gt;.  The NYT has now put infinitely more time, effort, and column inches into investigating Giuliani&#039;s convention speech statement that he told then police commissioner &quot;Thank God George Bush is president&quot; on 9/11/01 than they have, or likely every will, into looking at Kerry&#039;s claims for &lt;i&gt;Christmas (or any other day) in Cambodia&lt;/i&gt; having his memory seared.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT, but since the NYT is mentioned&#8230;  Those of you who have online accounts (I refuse to go through the NYT account nonsense again, so I can&#8217;t and won&#8217;t link) with the NYT or access for the dead tree version are invited to go look in the P Section, page P5, and see <i>Giuliani Described Remark to Kerik Years Ago</i>.  The NYT has now put infinitely more time, effort, and column inches into investigating Giuliani&#8217;s convention speech statement that he told then police commissioner &#8220;Thank God George Bush is president&#8221; on 9/11/01 than they have, or likely every will, into looking at Kerry&#8217;s claims for <i>Christmas (or any other day) in Cambodia</i> having his memory seared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Vee</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11679</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11679</guid>
		<description>Silver has indeed been very impressive on MSNBC&#039;s coverage. Compared with the other celebrities on both sides, Silver comes off as supremely knowledgeable (at least on modern historical aspects), he speaks to points rather than vainly trying to score them with put downs or non-sequiturs (unlike Ron Reagan who does no else and therefore has been soundly thrashed by Silver in their conflicts). He hardly looks overmatched next to old hands like Andrea Mitchell or Mike Barnicle. He is of course, not quite as savvy when it comes to &quot;inside politics&quot; as they are, but on arguments of history he appears to have superior knowledge. I&#039;m guessing history is a hobby/passion of his even outside of whatever political issues he wishes to debate.



He&#039;s been one of the stars of the convention, really.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver has indeed been very impressive on MSNBC&#8217;s coverage. Compared with the other celebrities on both sides, Silver comes off as supremely knowledgeable (at least on modern historical aspects), he speaks to points rather than vainly trying to score them with put downs or non-sequiturs (unlike Ron Reagan who does no else and therefore has been soundly thrashed by Silver in their conflicts). He hardly looks overmatched next to old hands like Andrea Mitchell or Mike Barnicle. He is of course, not quite as savvy when it comes to &#8220;inside politics&#8221; as they are, but on arguments of history he appears to have superior knowledge. I&#8217;m guessing history is a hobby/passion of his even outside of whatever political issues he wishes to debate.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been one of the stars of the convention, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeTooThen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11678</link>
		<dc:creator>MeTooThen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11678</guid>
		<description>Roger,



LOL!



I already had posted the Ron Silver-Roger L. Simon connection over at Allah&#039;s and Ace&#039;s place after Silver spoke.



Perhaps I revealed too soon, the growing conspiracy within the Celebropshere...



DextroStars!



And yes, per an old GF of mine who (still) lives in LA, who works with and around some of the A-listers, she often would tell me of James Woods&#039; Dextro tendencies. She thought I should meet him, but I demured.



I think Silver&#039;s speech was one of the best of the convention, if only for his righteous indignation and fury at his hypocritical Celebrosphere colleagues.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger,</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
<p>I already had posted the Ron Silver-Roger L. Simon connection over at Allah&#8217;s and Ace&#8217;s place after Silver spoke.</p>
<p>Perhaps I revealed too soon, the growing conspiracy within the Celebropshere&#8230;</p>
<p>DextroStars!</p>
<p>And yes, per an old GF of mine who (still) lives in LA, who works with and around some of the A-listers, she often would tell me of James Woods&#8217; Dextro tendencies. She thought I should meet him, but I demured.</p>
<p>I think Silver&#8217;s speech was one of the best of the convention, if only for his righteous indignation and fury at his hypocritical Celebrosphere colleagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehudit</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11677</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehudit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11677</guid>
		<description>&quot;Speaking of people I admire, Yehudit (if you&#039;re still around), I have long admired and valued what you do on your weblog.&quot;



Wow! Thanks! I also got a nice email today from Tacitus.

It&#039;s always hard to tell because I don&#039;t have a site counter and for some reason we don&#039;t get the same kinds of comment thread community as Roger or Charles or Tacitus or Michelle, so I am more insulated from feedback than many bloggers.



Right now I am working on a post tying together some of the links and stories about how a lot of Bush-haters behave, and my reaction to the social conservatives book panel. It&#039;s going to be about finding my ideological home in the Grownup Party.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Speaking of people I admire, Yehudit (if you&#8217;re still around), I have long admired and valued what you do on your weblog.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow! Thanks! I also got a nice email today from Tacitus.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always hard to tell because I don&#8217;t have a site counter and for some reason we don&#8217;t get the same kinds of comment thread community as Roger or Charles or Tacitus or Michelle, so I am more insulated from feedback than many bloggers.</p>
<p>Right now I am working on a post tying together some of the links and stories about how a lot of Bush-haters behave, and my reaction to the social conservatives book panel. It&#8217;s going to be about finding my ideological home in the Grownup Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandMan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11676</link>
		<dc:creator>RandMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11676</guid>
		<description>Ron Silver was terrific on Monday night.  And from what I&#039;ve read elsewhere, he&#039;s been quite impressive on the news/talking heads shows.



&lt;b&gt;Piranha&lt;/b&gt;



Earlier today I saw the FreeRepublic thread you mentioned.  Some of the posts had tears welling up in my eyes.  Of course, the same thing has happened reading some of the posts/comments here.



I was especially touched by Samuel&#039;s post from Monday evening.  This is a wonderful country.








</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Silver was terrific on Monday night.  And from what I&#8217;ve read elsewhere, he&#8217;s been quite impressive on the news/talking heads shows.</p>
<p><b>Piranha</b></p>
<p>Earlier today I saw the FreeRepublic thread you mentioned.  Some of the posts had tears welling up in my eyes.  Of course, the same thing has happened reading some of the posts/comments here.</p>
<p>I was especially touched by Samuel&#8217;s post from Monday evening.  This is a wonderful country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrye</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11675</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11675</guid>
		<description>Roger:



I have loved Silver for years.



He is not alone in Hollywood, but the list is not very long.



Bruce Willis, James Woods, Mel Gibson and of corse there are all those country western stars and the nascar drivers. I guess it just depends on how you define celebrity.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger:</p>
<p>I have loved Silver for years.</p>
<p>He is not alone in Hollywood, but the list is not very long.</p>
<p>Bruce Willis, James Woods, Mel Gibson and of corse there are all those country western stars and the nascar drivers. I guess it just depends on how you define celebrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11674</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 21:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2004/09/01/silver-star/#comment-11674</guid>
		<description>Ron Silver once portrayed Alan Dershowitz.  The latter gentleman seems quite upset with the radical liberals.  He even wrote this most interesting article:



http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13590



Does anybody know if Dershowitz is also backing President Bush?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Silver once portrayed Alan Dershowitz.  The latter gentleman seems quite upset with the radical liberals.  He even wrote this most interesting article:</p>
<p><a href="http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13590" rel="nofollow">http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13590</a></p>
<p>Does anybody know if Dershowitz is also backing President Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

