In both cases, we see the transference of what the media wanted, what could have been, versus what actually happened.

And THAT is why I dread a Clinton presidency. And I’m a liberal.

But back to Bhutto. Why is it everytime a person gets killed or something bad happens it’s W’s fault? He may have encouraged Bhutto to come back but *she* stayed.. She also took the risk of coming back to a country that, based on my readings, she took advantage of and would have taken again IF she was elected. She could have said no, and she could have taken Musshie’s advice and stayed down. It’s working for al-Sistani.

What I hate is that everything other people do or happens to them, it’s somehow Bush’s fault, regardless of their own actions. Now watch when Hillary! gets into office it will be everyone’s fault but hers! (I’m mostly ranting here, but I *am* concerned about such a thing happening, esp. in Mideast foreign policy)