The Kael Syndrome Returns: Why Democrats are in for a Big Surprise come November
Does Barack Obama realize the rate that the unborn in this country are slaughtered every year? If he did, how could he stand for it? How could he lobbey for it? How could he be a party to it? How could he
vote to fund it?
John McCain wants this wholesalew slaughter for conveneience stopped. He thinks adoption is a more humane solution.
I agree.
To fund abortion, you must value human life at a level you value an ant on the sidewalk. Or a worm on your lawn.
Unconscionnable.
1.3 healthy babies are killed each year out of convenience.
And Barack agrees with it. How can a Presidential contender put such a low value on human life? And if that’s not bad enough, Barack is now talking talking about denying lifesaving steps covered by insurance to men and women over 80 years old. You think Barack had a little German bood in his veins?
These are for the most part, gang, abortions of convenience. Not products of rape or incest. Just convenience. “Like, wow, I had my baby, I couldn’t date for three or four months. Wow, that’s a long time. Doctor, when it is convenient for you to poison my baby inside of me, please do it.”
This is what Barack is for.
Does it bother him that a lot of healthy babies are killed this way. Not in the slightest. “Except when the babies are black and future voters”, says Barack. That’s when he starts questioning abortions of convenience.
The right to kill babies isn’t in the constitution. If fact, the life, libety and happiness clause would seen to prevent it.




















