Obama’s 143 days, Hillary’s duty, and the politics of “experience” and “change”
In the absence of elected executive experience, the experience of radical non-profit boardrooms looms larger in Obama’s experience. Unfortunately. Having been there, also unfortunately, I have to say that the radical non-profit boardroom is a place where every human attribute and intent is first stomped down into boxes of “identity” and “victimization” and only after that process has eviscerated any possible sense of moving forward does anybody decide it is time to move forward. But then it is impossible to do so, because all that is left are these empty identities, which, ironically, works out well when achieving productivity would have produced something as damaging as an educational initiative based on Bill Ayer’s philosophy. Imagine how this would work in the White House, though, where there is a constant demand for real action, lubricated as it would be by a panting, fawning fourth estate. Last night Hillary Clinton graciously delivered an emotionally brilliant, politically accomplished speech, and today every Obama-besotted scribbler is holding his nose (at best) and whinging on that it was not enough. And that is the true message of these folks: not change but “Not Enough.” Not enough racial apologetics, not enough money thrown into underclass wormholes, not enough recrimination, not enough submission to their vision, never enough twisting on the prejudiced homiletics of political correctness. I cannot believe that out of a Party of millions, the Democrats have been mau maued into this particular corner by this singularly destructive faction. I suppose I can understand the dismay of the Obamaites last night: the difference between the Party of Clinton and the Party of Obama was excruciatingly visible.




















