I’m curious what Bonaccorsi finds repugnant in mixing the races and if sexual mixing is the only sort you oppose.

BTW, I never got the idea that JB thought alcohol should be banned. I’m curious though, why do do think public intoxication should be punishable by horse-whipping? Have you seen any significant cases of drunks falling from buildings? What if said building was private property? Until they climbed up on the roof and slipped they would not have behaved in a manner punishable by horse whipping.

Last question, the editorial was about drinking age not drunk-driving. I get it, and I assume most people do as well, that drunk driving is a serious crime. I even agree that drunk driving is not taken seriously enough by the law (although I’m not yet ready to accept the death penalty for these offenses). The question is, why did you project your anger for drunk driving at arguments about lowering the drinking age.